Farpour Hamid Reza, Fereydooni Farzane
M.D. Physiatrist, Assistant Professor, Bone and Joint Diseases Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
M.D. Physical medicine and Rehabilitation Resident, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran.
Electron Physician. 2017 Nov 25;9(11):5663-5669. doi: 10.19082/5663. eCollection 2017 Nov.
Osteoarthritis is a common degenerative disease. Prolotherapy is an alternative therapy used in multiple musculoskeletal disorders.
To compare the effectiveness of intra-articular dextrose injection versus peri-articular prolotherapy in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Fifty-two adults with painful primary knee osteoarthritis for at least three months were randomized to intra- and peri-articular injection groups. Prolotherapy was done twice with two week intervals. The outcome measures included the Oxford Knee Scale (OKS), Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which were obtained from patients before the first injection at the base line and after the second injection at the fourth and eighth weeks.
There were no statistically significant differences between demographic characteristics; before the injection, pain intensity, OKS, and WOMAC scores were approximately equal between the two groups. After dextrose prolotherapy, VAS, OKS, and WOMAC scores improved from baseline through the fourth and eighth weeks in both groups without any superiority between the two methods of injections (p<0.001).
Dextrose prolotherapy either intra- or peri-articular injection resulted in significant improvement, so it could be an inexpensive and effective management of knee osteoarthritis.
The study protocol was registered as a clinical trial under registration ID of IRCT2016091229795N1 at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.irct.ir).
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of this article.
骨关节炎是一种常见的退行性疾病。注射疗法是用于多种肌肉骨骼疾病的一种替代疗法。
比较关节内注射葡萄糖与关节周围注射疗法对膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者的疗效。
52名患有原发性膝关节骨关节炎且疼痛至少3个月的成年人被随机分为关节内注射组和关节周围注射组。注射疗法每隔两周进行两次。结果测量指标包括牛津膝关节量表(OKS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及视觉模拟量表(VAS),这些指标在基线时首次注射前以及在第四周和第八周第二次注射后从患者处获取。
人口统计学特征之间无统计学显著差异;注射前,两组之间的疼痛强度、OKS和WOMAC评分大致相等。葡萄糖注射疗法后,两组在第四周和第八周时VAS、OKS和WOMAC评分均较基线有所改善,两种注射方法之间无任何优势(p<0.001)。
关节内或关节周围注射葡萄糖注射疗法均带来显著改善,因此它可能是一种治疗膝骨关节炎的廉价且有效的方法。
该研究方案在伊朗临床试验注册中心(http://www.irct.ir)以注册号IRCT2016091229795N1注册为一项临床试验。
作者未获得该研究、撰写或发表本文的任何资金支持。