Shepherd Joanna M
Health Matrix Clevel. 2015;25:139-61.
Biologic drugs represent an important new category of drugs in the effort to improve health outcomes in this country. Yet, these cutting-edge drugs are often cost prohibitive, preventing access for many Americans. Recognizing the need for more affordable, generic substitutes for biologic drugs—or biosimilars—Congress recently created a biosimilars approval pathway that would enable these cheaper biologic drugs to obtain FDA approval and reach patients more quickly. Unfortunately, original biologics manufacturers have sought to extend their current monopoly profits by erecting various legal and regulatory barriers to entry. Their legal maneuvers take many forms, from delaying approval of safe biosimilars to abrogating previous commitments to international drug-naming protocols, and even circumventing Congressional intent for biosimilar substitution. Regrettably, these policies reduce competition in the market for biologic drugs, impede drug innovation, increase drug costs, and limit patient access to these important medications. This article explores the conflict between biologics and biosimilars, and the consequences that barriers to biosimilar entry in this market will create.
生物药物是该国为改善健康状况而努力的一类重要新型药物。然而,这些前沿药物往往价格高昂,许多美国人难以获得。认识到需要更具可承受性的生物药物通用替代品——即生物类似药,国会最近创建了一条生物类似药批准途径,使这些更便宜的生物药物能够更快获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准并惠及患者。不幸的是,原研生物制品制造商试图通过设置各种法律和监管准入障碍来延长其当前的垄断利润。他们的法律手段形式多样,从拖延安全生物类似药的批准到废除先前对国际药品命名协议的承诺,甚至规避国会关于生物类似药替代的意图。遗憾的是,这些政策减少了生物药物市场的竞争,阻碍了药物创新,增加了药品成本,并限制了患者获得这些重要药物的机会。本文探讨了生物制品与生物类似药之间的冲突,以及该市场中生物类似药准入障碍将产生的后果。