Suppr超能文献

坦桑尼亚药品零售商的疟疾相关知识与实践评估:探究药店认证的影响

An assessment of the malaria-related knowledge and practices of Tanzania's drug retailers: exploring the impact of drug store accreditation.

作者信息

Thomson Rebecca, Johanes Boniface, Festo Charles, Kalolella Admirabilis, Taylor Mark, Tougher Sarah, Ye Yazoume, Mann Andrea, Ren Ruilin, Bruxvoort Katia, Willey Barbara, Arnold Fred, Hanson Kara, Goodman Catherine

机构信息

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Ifakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 9;18(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2966-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2003 Tanzania has upgraded its approximately 7000 drug stores to Accredited Drug Dispensing Outlets (ADDOs), involving dispenser training, introduction of record keeping and enhanced regulation. Prior to accreditation, drug stores could officially stock over-the-counter medicines only, though many stocked prescription-only antimalarials. ADDOs are permitted to stock 49 prescription-only medicines, including artemisinin combination therapies and one form of quinine injectable. Oral artemisinin monotherapies and other injectables were not permitted at any time. By late 2011 conversion was complete in 14 of 21 regions. We explored variation in malaria-related knowledge and practices of drug retailers in ADDO and non-ADDO regions.

METHODS

Data were collected as part of the Independent Evaluation of the Affordable Medicines Facility - malaria (AMFm), involving a nationally representative survey of antimalarial retailers in October-December 2011. We randomly selected 49 wards and interviewed all drug stores stocking antimalarials. We compare ADDO and non-ADDO regions, excluding the largest city, Dar es Salaam, due to the unique characteristics of its market.

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted in 133 drug stores in ADDO regions and 119 in non-ADDO regions. Staff qualifications were very similar in both areas. There was no significant difference in the availability of the first line antimalarial (68.9% in ADDO regions and 65.2% in non-ADDO regions); both areas had over 98% availability of non-artemisinin therapies and below 3.0% of artemisinin monotherapies. Staff in ADDO regions had better knowledge of the first line antimalarial than non-ADDO regions (99.5% and 91.5%, p = 0.001). There was weak evidence of a lower price and higher market share of the first line antimalarial in ADDO regions. Drug stores in ADDO regions were more likely to stock ADDO-certified injectables than those in non-ADDO regions (23.0% and 3.9%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

ADDO conversion is frequently cited as a model for improving retail sector drug provision. Drug stores in ADDO regions performed better on some indicators, possibly indicating some small benefits from ADDO conversion, but also weaknesses in ADDO regulation and high staff turnover. More evidence is needed on the value-added and value for money of the ADDO roll out to inform retail policy in Tanzania and elsewhere.

摘要

背景

自2003年以来,坦桑尼亚已将其约7000家药店升级为经认证的药品零售点(ADDO),包括药剂师培训、引入记录保存以及加强监管。在认证之前,药店仅可正式储备非处方药,不过许多药店也储备了仅凭处方销售的抗疟药。ADDO被允许储备49种仅凭处方销售的药品,包括青蒿素联合疗法和一种奎宁注射剂。口服青蒿素单一疗法和其他注射剂在任何时候都不被允许。到2011年底,21个地区中的14个地区完成了转换。我们探究了ADDO地区和非ADDO地区药品零售商在疟疾相关知识和做法上的差异。

方法

作为可负担药品设施-疟疾(AMFm)独立评估的一部分收集数据,涉及2011年10月至12月对全国抗疟药零售商进行的具有全国代表性的调查。我们随机选择了49个行政区,并采访了所有储备抗疟药的药店。我们比较了ADDO地区和非ADDO地区,由于最大城市达累斯萨拉姆市场的独特特征,将其排除在外。

结果

在ADDO地区的133家药店和非ADDO地区的119家药店进行了访谈。两个地区的员工资质非常相似。一线抗疟药的可获得性没有显著差异(ADDO地区为68.9%,非ADDO地区为65.2%);两个地区非青蒿素疗法的可获得性均超过98%,青蒿素单一疗法的可获得性均低于3.0%。ADDO地区的员工比非ADDO地区的员工对一线抗疟药的了解更好(分别为99.5%和91.5%,p = 0.001)。有微弱证据表明ADDO地区一线抗疟药价格较低且市场份额较高。ADDO地区的药店比非ADDO地区的药店更有可能储备经ADDO认证的注射剂(分别为23.0%和3.9%,p = 0.005)。

结论

ADDO转换经常被视为改善零售部门药品供应的典范。ADDO地区的药店在一些指标上表现更好,这可能表明ADDO转换带来了一些小的益处,但也存在ADDO监管方面的弱点和员工高流动率问题。需要更多关于ADDO推广的附加值和性价比的证据,以为坦桑尼亚及其他地区的零售政策提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be13/5845369/2b4a7b470a85/12913_2018_2966_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验