Suppr超能文献

调强放疗时代 II 期鼻咽癌同期化疗的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The role of concurrent chemotherapy for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy era: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

The Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Mar 22;13(3):e0194733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194733. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical outcomes of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with those of radiotherapy alone for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) era.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We comprehensively searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify eligible studies. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) with hazard ratios (HRs), and toxicities with odd ratios (ORs) were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of seven studies met the criteria, with 1302 patients who were treated with IMRT alone or IMRT plus concurrent chemotherapy. No significant survival benefit was shown by CCRT regardless of OS (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.73-1.89, P = 0.508), PFS (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.38-1.50, P = 0.430), DMFS (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.33-2.41, P = 0.816), or LRRFS (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.95-1.12, P = 0.498). Additionally, CCRT notably increased the risk of acute grade 3-4 leukopenia (OR = 4.432, 95% CI 2.195-8.952, P < 0.001), compared to IMRT alone.

CONCLUSION

Adding concurrent chemotherapy to IMRT led to no survival benefit and increased acute toxicity reactions for stage II nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

摘要

目的

比较调强放疗(IMRT)时代,同期放化疗(CCRT)与单纯放疗治疗Ⅱ期鼻咽癌的临床结局。

材料与方法

我们全面检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆,以确定合格的研究。使用风险比(HRs)分析总生存(OS)、无进展生存(PFS)、无远处转移生存(DMFS)、无局部区域复发生存(LRRFS),使用比值比(ORs)分析毒性。

结果

共有 7 项研究符合标准,共纳入 1302 例接受单纯 IMRT 或 IMRT 加同期化疗的患者。CCRT 并未带来 OS(HR = 1.17,95%CI 0.73-1.89,P = 0.508)、PFS(HR = 0.76,95%CI 0.38-1.50,P = 0.430)、DMFS(HR = 0.89,95%CI 0.33-2.41,P = 0.816)或 LRRFS(HR = 1.03,95%CI 0.95-1.12,P = 0.498)的显著生存获益。此外,与单纯 IMRT 相比,CCRT 显著增加了急性 3-4 级白细胞减少症的风险(OR = 4.432,95%CI 2.195-8.952,P < 0.001)。

结论

对于Ⅱ期鼻咽癌,在 IMRT 的基础上加用同期化疗并不能带来生存获益,反而增加了急性毒性反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/132b/5864049/71ca76a9a97d/pone.0194733.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验