Poverty, Health and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Oct;14(4):e12613. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12613. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
Understanding implementation of interventions is critical to illuminate if, how, and why the interventions achieve impact. Alive & Thrive integrated a nutrition intervention into an existing maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) programme in Bangladesh, documenting improvements in women's micronutrient supplement intake and dietary diversity. Here, we examined how well the nutrition intervention was implemented and which elements of implementation explained intervention impact. Survey data were collected in 2015 and 2016 from frontline health workers (FLW) and households in areas randomized to nutrition-focused MNCH (intensified interpersonal counselling, community mobilization, distribution of free micronutrient supplements, and weight-gain monitoring) or standard MNCH (antenatal care with standard nutrition counselling). Seven intervention elements were measured: time commitment, training quality, knowledge, coverage, counselling quality, supervision, and incentives. Multiple regression was used to derive difference-in-differences (DID) estimates. Using village-level endline data, path analysis was used to determine which elements most explained intervention impacts. FLWs in both areas were highly committed and well supervised. Coverage was high (>90%) for counselling, supplement provision, and weight-gain monitoring. Improvements were significantly greater for nutrition-focused MNCH, versus standard MNCH, for training quality (DID: 2.42 points of 10), knowledge (DID: 1.20 points), delivery coverage (DID: 4.16 points), and counselling quality (DID: 1.60 points). Impact was substantially explained by coverage and delivery quality. In conclusion, integration nutrition intervention into the MNCH programme was feasible and well-implemented. Although differences in coverage and counselling quality most explained impacts, all intervention elements-particularly FLW training and performance-were likely important to achieving impact.
了解干预措施的实施情况对于阐明干预措施是否、如何以及为何产生影响至关重要。Alive & Thrive 在孟加拉国将营养干预措施纳入现有的母婴和儿童健康(MNCH)方案中,记录了妇女微量营养素补充剂摄入和饮食多样性的改善。在这里,我们研究了营养干预措施的实施情况如何,以及实施的哪些要素解释了干预措施的影响。2015 年和 2016 年,从参与营养重点 MNCH(强化人际咨询、社区动员、免费微量营养素补充剂分发和体重增加监测)或标准 MNCH(产前护理和标准营养咨询)的地区的一线卫生工作者(FLW)和家庭中收集了调查数据。测量了七个干预要素:时间投入、培训质量、知识、覆盖率、咨询质量、监督和激励。使用多元回归得出差异(DID)估计值。利用村庄层面的终线数据,路径分析用于确定哪些要素最能解释干预措施的影响。两个地区的 FLW 都高度投入并受到良好监督。咨询、补充提供和体重增加监测的覆盖率均很高(>90%)。与标准 MNCH 相比,营养重点 MNCH 方面的培训质量(DID:10 分中的 2.42 分)、知识(DID:1.20 分)、提供覆盖率(DID:4.16 分)和咨询质量(DID:1.60 分)的改善显著更大。覆盖率和提供质量对影响有很大解释。总之,将营养干预措施纳入 MNCH 方案是可行的,实施情况良好。尽管覆盖率和咨询质量的差异最能解释影响,但所有干预要素——尤其是 FLW 的培训和绩效——对于实现影响可能都很重要。