Westbrook Andrew, Frank Michael
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Kapittelweg 29, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Aug;22:28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.12.011. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
Cognitive control - the ability to override a salient or prepotent action to execute a more deliberate one - is required for flexible, goal-directed behavior, and yet it is subjectively costly: decision-makers avoid allocating control resources, even when doing so affords more valuable outcomes. Dopamine likely offsets effort costs just as it does for physical effort. And yet, dopamine can also promote impulsive action, undermining control. We propose a novel hypothesis that reconciles opposing effects of dopamine on cognitive control: during action selection, striatal dopamine biases benefits relative to costs, but does so preferentially for "proximal" motor and cognitive actions. Considering the nature of instrumental affordances and their dynamics during action selection facilitates a parsimonious interpretation and conserved corticostriatal mechanisms across physical and cognitive domains.
认知控制——即超越显著或优势动作以执行更审慎动作的能力——是灵活的、目标导向行为所必需的,但它在主观上代价高昂:决策者会避免分配控制资源,即便这样做能带来更有价值的结果。多巴胺可能像抵消体力付出成本一样抵消努力成本。然而,多巴胺也会促进冲动行为,破坏控制。我们提出了一个新假说,调和多巴胺对认知控制的相反作用:在动作选择过程中,纹状体多巴胺使收益相对于成本产生偏差,但对“近端”运动和认知动作优先如此。考虑到工具性可供性的本质及其在动作选择过程中的动态变化,有助于在物理和认知领域进行简洁的解释并保留皮质纹状体机制。