Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI.
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):191-196. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002819.
To evaluate whether hospital participation in accountable care organizations (ACOs) is associated with reduced Medicare spending for inpatient surgery.
ACOs have proliferated rapidly and now cover more than 32 million Americans. Medicare Shared Savings Program (MSSP) ACOs have shown modest success in reducing medical spending. Whether they have reduced surgical spending remains unknown.
We used 100% Medicare claims from 2010 to 2014 for patients aged 65 to 99 years undergoing 6 common elective surgical procedures [abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, colectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), hip or knee replacement, or lung resection]. We compared total Medicare payments for 30-day surgical episodes, payments for individual components of care (index hospitalization, readmissions, physician services, and postacute care), and clinical outcomes for patients treated at MSSP ACO hospitals versus matched controls at non-ACO hospitals. We accounted for preexisting trends independent of ACO participation using a difference-in-differences approach.
Among 341,675 patients at 427 ACO hospitals and 1,024,090 matched controls at 1531 non-ACO hospitals, patient and hospital characteristics were well-balanced. Average baseline payments were similar at ACO versus non-ACO hospitals. ACO participation was not associated with reductions in total Medicare payments [difference-in-differences estimate=-$72, confidence interval (CI95%): -$228 to +$84] or individual components of payments. ACO participation was also not associated with clinical outcomes. Duration of ACO participation did not affect our estimates.
Although Medicare ACOs have had success reducing spending for medical care, they have not had similar success with surgical spending. Given that surgical care accounts for 30% of total health care costs, ACOs and policymakers must pay greater attention to reducing surgical expenditures.
评估医院参与问责制医疗组织(ACO)是否与降低医疗保险住院手术支出有关。
ACO 迅速普及,现已覆盖超过 3200 万美国人。医疗保险储蓄计划(MSSP)ACO 已在降低医疗支出方面取得了一定的成功。但它们是否降低了手术支出仍不得而知。
我们使用了 2010 年至 2014 年期间年龄在 65 至 99 岁之间接受 6 种常见择期手术(腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复、结肠切除术、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、髋关节或膝关节置换术或肺切除术)的患者的 100%医疗保险索赔数据。我们比较了 MSSP ACO 医院和非 ACO 医院治疗的患者的 30 天手术期的总医疗保险支付、护理各个组成部分(索引住院、再入院、医生服务和急性后护理)的支付,以及临床结果。我们使用差异中的差异方法,独立于 ACO 参与考虑了先前存在的趋势。
在 427 家 ACO 医院的 341675 名患者和 1531 家非 ACO 医院的 1024090 名匹配对照中,患者和医院特征均衡。ACO 与非 ACO 医院的平均基线支付额相似。ACO 参与与医疗保险总支付额的降低无关[差异中的差异估计值=-$72,置信区间(CI95%):-$228 至+$84]或支付的各个组成部分。ACO 参与也与临床结果无关。ACO 参与的持续时间并没有影响我们的估计。
尽管医疗保险 ACO 已在降低医疗保健支出方面取得成功,但在手术支出方面却没有取得类似的成功。鉴于手术护理占总医疗保健费用的 30%,ACO 和政策制定者必须更加关注降低手术支出。