Suppr超能文献

静脉亚分离剂量氯胺酮与吗啡治疗急诊科急性老年疼痛:一项随机对照试验。

Intravenous subdissociative-dose ketamine versus morphine for acute geriatric pain in the Emergency Department: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;37(2):220-227. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.05.030. Epub 2018 May 16.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

We compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of subdissociative intravenous-dose ketamine (SDK) versus morphine in geriatric Emergency Department (ED) patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating ED patients aged 65 and older experiencing moderate to severe acute abdominal, flank, musculoskeletal, or malignant pain. Patients were randomized to receive SDK at 0.3 mg/kg or morphine at 0.1 mg/kg by short intravenous infusion over 15 min. Evaluations occurred at 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. Primary outcome was reduction in pain at 30 min. Secondary outcomes included overall rates of adverse effects and incidence of rescue analgesia.

RESULTS

Thirty patients per group were enrolled in the study. The primary change in mean pain scores was not significantly different in the ketamine and morphine groups: 9.0 versus 8.4 at baseline (mean difference 0.6; 95% CI -0.30 to 1.43) and 4.2 versus 4.4 at 30 min (mean difference -0.2; 95% CI -1.93 to1.46). Patients in the SDK group reported higher rates of psychoperceptual adverse effects at 15, 30, and 60 min post drug administration. Two patients in the ketamine group and one in the morphine group experienced brief desaturation episodes. There were no statistically significant differences with respect to changes in vital signs and need for rescue medication.

CONCLUSION

SDK administered at 0.3 mg/kg over 15 min provides analgesic efficacy comparable to morphine for short-term treatment of acute pain in the geriatric ED patients but results in higher rates of psychoperceptual adverse effects. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration #: NCT02673372.

摘要

研究目的

我们比较了亚分离剂量静脉注射氯胺酮(SDK)与吗啡在老年急诊科(ED)患者中的镇痛效果和安全性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验,评估了年龄在 65 岁及以上、有中度至重度急性腹痛、侧腹、肌肉骨骼或恶性疼痛的 ED 患者。患者随机接受 0.3mg/kg 的 SDK 或 0.1mg/kg 的吗啡,通过 15 分钟的短静脉输注。在 15、30、60、90 和 120 分钟进行评估。主要结果是 30 分钟时疼痛减轻。次要结果包括不良事件的总发生率和抢救性镇痛的发生率。

结果

每组纳入 30 名患者。两组患者的平均疼痛评分的主要变化无显著差异:基线时 9.0 与 8.4(平均差值 0.6;95%CI-0.30 至 1.43)和 30 分钟时 4.2 与 4.4(平均差值-0.2;95%CI-1.93 至 1.46)。接受 SDK 治疗的患者在给药后 15、30 和 60 分钟时报告了更高比例的精神知觉不良事件。SDK 组有 2 名患者和吗啡组有 1 名患者发生短暂的血氧饱和度下降。在生命体征的变化和抢救用药的需求方面,没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在 15 分钟内给予 0.3mg/kg 的 SDK 提供了与吗啡短期治疗老年 ED 患者急性疼痛相当的镇痛效果,但导致更高比例的精神知觉不良事件。ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT02673372。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验