Bach Peter, Reicherz Alina, Teichman Joel, Dahlkamp Lisa, von Landenberg Nicolas, Palisaar Rein-Jueri, Noldus Joachim, von Bodman Christian
Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Department of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Int J Urol. 2018 Aug;25(8):717-722. doi: 10.1111/iju.13711. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
To determine whether short-term stenting using an external ureter catheter following ureterorenoscopic stone extraction provides a better outcome in comparison to double-J stent ureteral stenting.
Between August 2014 and August 2015, 141 patients initially managed with a double-J stent insertion were prospectively randomized to ureter catheter for 6 h vs double-J stent insertion for 5 days after stone extraction via ureteroscopy retrograde surgery (including flexible ureteroscopy retrograde surgery) in a single academic center. Endoscopic procedures were performed by nine surgeons. Exclusion criteria were acute urinary tract infection, a solitary kidney, or a stone mass more than 25 mm. Study endpoints were ureter-stent related symptoms and pain assessed by a validated questionnaire (ureteral stent symptom questionnaire) and visual analogue scale before and 4 weeks after surgery.
Overall stone-free rate was more than 90%. Mean operative time was 24 min (range 5-63). Groups did not differ in terms of age, body mass index, and stone size. Patients who received short-term ureter catheter showed a significantly higher quality of life. In the ureter catheter group, the urinary index score (16.8 vs 27.8; P < 0.0001), the pain score (9.7 ± 1.3 vs 20.2 ± 1.5; P < 0.0001), and general health index (15.3 ± 0.7 vs 8.5 ± 0.6; P < 0.0001) were significantly lower. Consultation of a physician and antibiotic treatment were rarely needed (1.3 ± 0.1 vs 1.6 ± 0.1; P = 0.017).
A short-term ureter catheter insertion for 6 h following ureteroscopy retrograde surgery stone removal is a safe procedure and superior to double-J stent insertion with regard to urinary symptoms, pain, quality of life, and stent related symptoms. Patients treated with a short-term ureter catheter recover more quickly, return to work earlier, and need less doctor visits. Most patients would recommend a ureter catheter, and would prefer this strategy in case of future stone treatments.
确定输尿管镜取石术后使用外置输尿管导管进行短期支架置入与双J支架输尿管支架置入相比是否能带来更好的结果。
在2014年8月至2015年8月期间,在一个学术中心,141例最初接受双J支架置入治疗的患者通过输尿管镜逆行手术(包括软性输尿管镜逆行手术)取石后,被前瞻性随机分为接受输尿管导管置入6小时组和双J支架置入5天组。内镜手术由9名外科医生进行。排除标准为急性尿路感染、单肾或结石直径超过25mm。研究终点是通过一份经过验证的问卷(输尿管支架症状问卷)和视觉模拟量表在手术前及术后4周评估与输尿管支架相关的症状和疼痛。
总体无石率超过90%。平均手术时间为24分钟(范围5 - 63分钟)。两组在年龄、体重指数和结石大小方面无差异。接受短期输尿管导管置入的患者生活质量明显更高。在输尿管导管组,尿液指标评分(16.8对27.8;P < 0.0001)、疼痛评分(9.7±1.3对20.2±1.5;P < 0.0001)和总体健康指数(15.3±0.7对8.5±0.6;P < 0.0001)明显更低。很少需要医生会诊和抗生素治疗(1.3±0.1对1.6±0.1;P = 0.017)。
输尿管镜逆行手术后取石后短期置入输尿管导管6小时是一种安全的操作,在尿路症状、疼痛、生活质量和与支架相关的症状方面优于双J支架置入。接受短期输尿管导管治疗的患者恢复更快,更早重返工作岗位,看医生的次数更少。大多数患者会推荐输尿管导管,并在未来结石治疗时更倾向于这种策略。