Suppr超能文献

影响肠道药物体外渗透的人体肠液因素。

Human intestinal fluid factors affecting intestinal drug permeation in vitro.

机构信息

KU Leuven, Drug Delivery and Disposition, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.

KU Leuven, Drug Delivery and Disposition, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Aug 30;121:338-346. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 15.

Abstract

Intestinal permeability assessment is an important aspect of drug development, which strongly depends on the solvent system used in the intestinal donor compartment. For this purpose, human intestinal fluids (HIF) can be considered as the golden standard. A recent study demonstrated a reduced apparent permeation across rat intestinal tissue from fed versus fasted state HIF for 9 out of 16 compounds tested. Commercially available fed and fasted state simulated fluids (FeSSIF and FaSSIF) reproduced this food effect for only 3 out of 16 compounds. To elucidate this observed difference, the current study assessed the impact of relevant intestinal fluid factors (bile salt, phospholipids, cholesterol, free fatty acids (FFA), monoacylglycerides (MAG)) and 2-factor interactions at a fixed pH of 6.5 on drug permeation across both rat tissue (Ussing chambers setup) and an artificial membrane (dialysis setup). Four representative compounds were selected for the permeation experiments: for propranolol and indomethacin, a food-induced permeation reduction was previously seen in both HIF and SIF; for metoprolol and darunavir, a reduction was only seen in HIF. Using a fractional 2 design of experiments (DoE) approach, 16 SIF combinations were defined as donor media for permeation studies. In the Ussing chambers (rat tissue), FFA and MAG reduced the permeation for all 4 compounds. Only for propranolol and indomethacin, permeation was further reduced by bile salts and phospholipids. This explains why the use of FeSSIF vs FaSSIF, lacking FFA and MAG, predicted a negative food effect for propranolol and indomethacin but not for metoprolol and darunavir. In the dialysis set-up using an artificial membrane, significantly higher permeation rates compared to the Ussing chambers were observed. Under those conditions, FFA and MAG no longer reduced permeation, while bile salts and phospholipids still did. This may indicate that lipidic structures can provide depot release in the case of a dynamic equilibrium between free and entrapped drug.

摘要

肠道通透性评估是药物开发的一个重要方面,这在很大程度上取决于肠道供体腔室中使用的溶剂系统。为此,可以将人肠液(HIF)视为金标准。最近的一项研究表明,在 16 种测试化合物中,有 9 种化合物的肠道组织表观渗透系数在进食状态和禁食状态的 HIF 之间存在差异。而市售的进食和禁食状态模拟液(FeSSIF 和 FaSSIF)仅能复制其中 3 种化合物的这种食物效应。为了解释这种观察到的差异,本研究评估了相关肠液因素(胆汁盐、磷脂、胆固醇、游离脂肪酸(FFA)、单酰基甘油(MAG))和 2 因素相互作用在固定 pH 值 6.5 条件下对两种大鼠组织(Ussing 室设置)和人工膜(透析设置)中药物渗透的影响。选择了 4 种代表性化合物进行渗透实验:对于普萘洛尔和吲哚美辛,先前在 HIF 和 SIF 中都观察到了食物诱导的渗透减少;对于美托洛尔和达鲁那韦,仅在 HIF 中观察到了减少。使用部分 2 设计的实验(DoE)方法,16 种 SIF 组合被定义为渗透研究的供体介质。在 Ussing 室(大鼠组织)中,FFA 和 MAG 降低了所有 4 种化合物的渗透。只有对于普萘洛尔和吲哚美辛,胆汁盐和磷脂进一步降低了渗透。这解释了为什么使用缺乏 FFA 和 MAG 的 FeSSIF 与 FaSSIF 预测普萘洛尔和吲哚美辛的食物效应为负,但对美托洛尔和达鲁那韦则不然。在使用人工膜的透析装置中,与 Ussing 室相比,观察到显著更高的渗透速率。在这些条件下,FFA 和 MAG 不再降低渗透,而胆汁盐和磷脂仍然如此。这可能表明在游离药物和包裹药物之间存在动态平衡的情况下,脂类结构可以提供药物储存释放。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验