National Addictions Management Service, Institute of Mental Health, 10 Buangkok View, 539747, Singapore.
Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Aug;91:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.04.012. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Many individuals leave costly inpatient detoxification programs prematurely because of the severity of withdrawal symptoms experienced. In the absence of opioid-assisted detoxification in Singapore, diazepam is used to manage withdrawal. However since diazepam is addictive, there is a need to explore the effectiveness of alternative medications.
The study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of lofexidine, a non-opiate, non-addictive, alpha 2-adrenergic agonist in assisting opioid detoxification in Singapore, using a randomized, double-blind, investigator-initiated placebo-controlled trial comparing lofexidine against diazepam. Opioid dependent patients (n = 111) were randomized to receive a 10-day course of lofexidine (n = 56) or diazepam (n = 55). The primary endpoint was the Objective Opioid Withdrawal Scale (OOWS) score on days 3 and 4 and secondary outcomes were the Short Opioid Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) score, program retention rate, and ratings of opiate craving.
The OOWS, SOWS and opiate craving scores were consistently lower in the lofexidine group relative to the diazepam group over the 14-day study period; however no statistically significant differences were found on days 3 and 4 (peak withdrawal). Changes in mean pupil size during peak withdrawal were significantly smaller in the lofexidine group and more participants in the lofexidine group remained in treatment and completed detoxification.
Lofexidine was at least as effective as diazepam in reducing the opioid withdrawal syndrome and increased treatment retention. In addition to its non-addictive and non-abuse properties, lofexidine has several clinical advantages over diazepam. The use of lofexidine is recommended when opioid-assisted medications are not available.
许多人因戒断症状严重而提前离开昂贵的住院戒毒治疗计划。在新加坡没有阿片类药物辅助戒毒的情况下,使用地西泮来管理戒断症状。然而,由于地西泮具有成瘾性,因此需要探索替代药物的有效性。
本研究旨在使用随机、双盲、研究者发起的安慰剂对照试验,比较可乐定和地西泮,来检验可乐定作为一种非阿片类、非成瘾性、α2-肾上腺素能激动剂,在协助新加坡阿片类药物戒断方面的安全性和有效性。纳入了 111 名阿片类药物依赖患者,随机分为可乐定(n=56)或地西泮(n=55)组,接受为期 10 天的治疗。主要终点是第 3 天和第 4 天的客观阿片戒断量表(OOWS)评分,次要终点是短阿片戒断量表(SOWS)评分、保留率和阿片类药物渴求评分。
在整个 14 天的研究期间,可乐定组的 OOWS、SOWS 和阿片类药物渴求评分始终低于地西泮组;然而,在第 3 天和第 4 天(戒断高峰)未发现统计学差异。在戒断高峰期间,可乐定组的平均瞳孔大小变化明显较小,且更多的可乐定组参与者完成了治疗并完成了戒毒。
可乐定在减轻阿片类戒断综合征方面至少与地西泮一样有效,并增加了治疗保留率。除了非成瘾性和非滥用性外,可乐定在地西泮具有几个临床优势。在没有阿片类药物辅助药物的情况下,推荐使用可乐定。