School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Public Health & Social Work, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 18;18(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1871-5.
In response to rising rates of medical intervention in birth, there has been increased international interest in promoting normal birth (without induction of labour, epidural/spinal/general anaesthesia, episiotomy, forceps/vacuum, or caesarean section). However, there is limited evidence for how best to achieve increased rates of normal birth. In this study we examined the role of modifiable and non-modifiable factors in experiencing a normal birth using retrospective, self-reported data.
Women who gave birth over a four-month period in Queensland, Australia, were invited to complete a questionnaire about their preferences for and experiences of pregnancy, labour, birth, and postnatal care. Responses (N = 5840) were analysed using multiple logistic regression models to identify associations with four aspects of normal birth: onset of labour, use of anaesthesia, mode of birth, and use of episiotomy. The probability of normal birth was then estimated by combining these models.
Overall, 28.7% of women experienced a normal birth. Probability of a normal birth was reduced for women who were primiparous, had a history of caesarean, had a multiple pregnancy, were older, had a more advanced gestational age, experienced pregnancy-related health conditions (gestational diabetes, low-lying placenta, high blood pressure), had continuous electronic fetal monitoring during labour, and knew only some of their care providers for labour and birth. Women had a higher probability of normal birth if they lived outside major metropolitan areas, did not receive private obstetric care, had freedom of movement throughout labour, received continuity of care in labour and birth, did not have an augmented labour, or gave birth in a non-supine position.
Our findings highlight several relevant modifiable factors including mobility, monitoring, and care provision during labour and birth, for increasing normal birth opportunity. An important step forward in promoting normal birth is increasing awareness of such relationships through patient involvement in informed decision-making and implementation of this evidence in care guidelines.
由于医疗干预分娩的比例不断上升,国际上越来越关注促进正常分娩(不包括引产、硬膜外/脊髓/全身麻醉、会阴切开术、产钳/吸引器、剖宫产)。然而,关于如何最好地提高正常分娩率的证据有限。在这项研究中,我们使用回顾性、自我报告的数据,研究了经历正常分娩的可改变和不可改变因素的作用。
在澳大利亚昆士兰州,邀请在四个月期间分娩的女性完成一份关于她们对怀孕、分娩、产后护理的偏好和经历的问卷。使用多因素逻辑回归模型分析这些回答(n=5840),以确定与正常分娩的四个方面(分娩开始、使用麻醉、分娩方式和会阴切开术)相关的因素。然后,通过结合这些模型来估计正常分娩的概率。
总体而言,28.7%的女性经历了正常分娩。初产妇、有剖宫产史、多胎妊娠、年龄较大、妊娠晚期、妊娠相关健康状况(妊娠糖尿病、胎盘位置低、高血压)、分娩期间持续电子胎儿监测以及仅了解部分分娩和分娩护理提供者的女性,正常分娩的可能性较低。如果女性居住在大都市以外地区、不接受私人产科护理、在分娩过程中有自由活动、在分娩和分娩过程中接受连续性护理、没有催产、或非仰卧位分娩,则正常分娩的可能性更高。
我们的研究结果突出了几个相关的可改变因素,包括分娩过程中的活动能力、监测和护理,这些因素可增加正常分娩的机会。通过让患者参与知情决策并在护理指南中实施这些证据,提高对这些关系的认识,是促进正常分娩的重要一步。