Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT, 84322, USA.
School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Ecol Lett. 2018 Sep;21(9):1319-1329. doi: 10.1111/ele.13098. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
Theory predicts that intraspecific competition should be stronger than interspecific competition for any pair of stably coexisting species, yet previous literature reviews found little support for this pattern. We screened over 5400 publications and identified 39 studies that quantified phenomenological intraspecific and interspecific interactions in terrestrial plant communities. Of the 67% of species pairs in which both intra- and interspecific effects were negative (competitive), intraspecific competition was, on average, four to five-fold stronger than interspecific competition. Of the remaining pairs, 93% featured intraspecific competition and interspecific facilitation, a situation that stabilises coexistence. The difference between intra- and interspecific effects tended to be larger in observational than experimental data sets, in field than greenhouse studies, and in studies that quantified population growth over the full life cycle rather than single fitness components. Our results imply that processes promoting stable coexistence at local scales are common and consequential across terrestrial plant communities.
理论预测,对于任何一对稳定共存的物种,种内竞争应该比种间竞争更强,但之前的文献综述几乎没有支持这种模式的证据。我们筛选了超过 5400 篇文献,确定了 39 项研究,这些研究量化了陆地植物群落中现象学的种内和种间相互作用。在 67%的物种对中,种内和种间效应都是负的(竞争),种内竞争的平均强度是种间竞争的四到五倍。在剩下的物种对中,93%的物种表现出种内竞争和种间促进作用,这种情况稳定了共存。在观察性数据集而不是实验数据集、在野外研究而不是温室研究、以及在量化整个生命周期而不是单一适合度成分的种群增长的研究中,种内和种间效应的差异往往更大。我们的研究结果表明,促进局部尺度稳定共存的过程在陆地植物群落中是普遍存在的,而且具有重要意义。