Mahmoodi-Aghdam Masoumeh, Dehghani Mohsen, Ahmadi Mehrnoosh, Khorrami Banaraki Anahita, Khatibi Ali
Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Tehran, Iran.
Family Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Basic Clin Neurosci. 2017 Nov-Dec;8(6):467-478. doi: 10.29252/nirp.bcn.8.6.467.
According to the pain research literature, attentional bias for pain is the mechanism responsible for the development and maintenance of fear of pain in patients with chronic pain. However, there is still some debate about the exact mechanism and the role of faster engagement versus difficulty in disengagement in the development of attentional bias.
To investigate attentional bias in patients with chronic pain, we used an eye-tracker with the pictures of pain-provoking activities and compared the results with an age- and gender-matched group of pain-free participants. In addition, other measures of pain-related cognition and pain severity ratings were included to assess their contribution to the attentional bias toward pain-related information.
Calculating the frequency of the first fixations showed that both groups fixated initially on pain-provoking pictures compared to neutral one. Calculating the speed of fixations showed that control participants were faster in fixating on neutral stimuli, but patients with pain were faster in fixating on pain-provoking pictures, indicating a relative vigilance for the pain-related stimuli among them. These patients reported that the intensity of pain in the previous week was positively correlated with the speed of their fixation on the painful stimuli.
Although these results did not provide unequivocal support for the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis, they are generally consistent with the results of studies using eye tracking technology. Furthermore, our findings put a question over characterization of attentional biases in patients with chronic pain by simply relating that to difficulty in disengaging from pain-related stimuli.
根据疼痛研究文献,对疼痛的注意偏向是慢性疼痛患者疼痛恐惧形成和维持的机制。然而,对于注意偏向形成的确切机制以及在注意偏向发展过程中更快参与与脱离困难所起的作用仍存在一些争议。
为了研究慢性疼痛患者的注意偏向,我们使用眼动仪和引发疼痛活动的图片,并将结果与年龄和性别匹配的无疼痛参与者组进行比较。此外,还纳入了其他疼痛相关认知测量和疼痛严重程度评分,以评估它们对与疼痛相关信息的注意偏向的影响。
计算首次注视的频率表明,与中性图片相比,两组最初都更关注引发疼痛的图片。计算注视速度表明,对照组参与者注视中性刺激的速度更快,但疼痛患者注视引发疼痛图片的速度更快,这表明他们对与疼痛相关的刺激相对更警觉。这些患者报告说,前一周的疼痛强度与他们注视疼痛刺激的速度呈正相关。
尽管这些结果并未为警觉-回避假说提供明确支持,但总体上与使用眼动追踪技术的研究结果一致。此外,我们的研究结果对仅通过将慢性疼痛患者的注意偏向与脱离疼痛相关刺激的困难程度相关联来进行特征描述提出了质疑。