Department of Gastroenterology, International University of Health and Welfare Hospital, Iguchi 537-3, Nasushiobara, Tochigi, 329-2763, Japan.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Midorigaoka-Higashi 2-1-1-1, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, 078-8510, Japan.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2018 Jun 28;17(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12941-018-0281-x.
All Helicobacter pylori-infected patients are recommended for eradication with an appropriate regimen in each geographic area. The choice of the therapy is somewhat dependent on the antimicrobial susceptibility. The rate of clarithromycin resistance has been increasing and is associated with failure; thus, susceptibility testing is recommended before triple therapy with clarithromycin. However, antimicrobial susceptibility testing is not yet clinically available and an alternative newly developed acid inhibitor vonoprazan is used for triple therapy in Japan. The aim of this study was to determine whether vonoprazan-based triple therapy is plausible treatment in H. pylori eradication.
A retrospective observational study of H. pylori eradication was conducted in a single institute. The patients who requested antimicrobial susceptibility testing were treated with susceptibility-guided proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy in International University of Health and Welfare Hospital from 2013 to 2016. Other patients were treated with empirical treatment with a proton pump inhibitor. From 2015 to 2016, vonoprazan-based triple treatment (vonoprazan, 20 mg; amoxicillin, 750 mg; and clarithromycin, 200 or 400 mg, b.i.d.) was conducted, and its effectiveness was compared with susceptibility-guided proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy. We also investigated the improvement in eradication rate when antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed, and compared the outcomes of vonoprazan-based and proton pump inhibitor-based empirical therapy.
A total of 1355 patients who received first-line eradication treatment were enrolled in the present study. The eradication rates of the empirical proton pump inhibitor-based therapy and the vonoprazan-based therapy group in a per-protocol analysis were 86.3% (95% CI 83.8-88.8) and 97.4% (95% CI 95.7-99.1), respectively. In 212 patients who received antimicrobial susceptibility testing, the rate of clarithromycin resistant was 23.5% and the eradication rate in susceptibility-guided treatment was 95.7% (95% CI 92.9-98.4). The difference between susceptibility-guided and vonoprazan-based therapy was - 1.7% (95% CI - 4.9 to 1.5%), and the non-inferiority of vonoprazan-based triple therapy was confirmed.
Vonoprazan-based triple therapy was effective as susceptibility-guided triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. An empirical triple therapy with vonoprazan is preferable even in area with high rates of clarithromycin-resistance. Trial registration The study was retrospectively registered in University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000032351).
所有幽门螺杆菌感染的患者都建议在各个地区采用适当的方案进行根除治疗。治疗方法的选择在一定程度上取决于抗生素的敏感性。克拉霉素耐药率一直在上升,并与治疗失败有关;因此,建议在进行克拉霉素三联疗法之前进行药敏试验。然而,抗生素药敏试验尚未在临床上应用,日本则使用新开发的酸抑制剂沃诺拉赞进行三联疗法。本研究旨在确定沃诺拉赞为基础的三联疗法是否是幽门螺杆菌根除的可行治疗方法。
本研究为单中心回顾性观察性研究。2013 年至 2016 年,国际医疗福祉大学医院对要求进行抗生素药敏试验的患者采用药敏指导的质子泵抑制剂三联疗法进行治疗。其他患者则采用经验性质子泵抑制剂治疗。从 2015 年到 2016 年,进行了沃诺拉赞三联治疗(沃诺拉赞 20mg;阿莫西林 750mg;克拉霉素 200 或 400mg,每日两次),并将其疗效与药敏指导的质子泵抑制剂三联疗法进行了比较。我们还研究了进行抗生素药敏试验后,根除率的提高情况,并比较了沃诺拉赞为基础和质子泵抑制剂为基础的经验性治疗的结果。
本研究共纳入了 1355 例接受一线根除治疗的患者。意向治疗分析中,经验性质子泵抑制剂三联疗法和沃诺拉赞三联疗法组的根除率分别为 86.3%(95%可信区间 83.8-88.8)和 97.4%(95%可信区间 95.7-99.1)。在 212 例接受抗生素药敏试验的患者中,克拉霉素耐药率为 23.5%,药敏指导治疗的根除率为 95.7%(95%可信区间 92.9-98.4)。药敏指导与沃诺拉赞三联疗法之间的差异为-1.7%(95%可信区间-4.9 至 1.5%),沃诺拉赞三联疗法的非劣效性得到了确认。
沃诺拉赞三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌的根除与药敏指导的三联疗法一样有效。即使在克拉霉素耐药率较高的地区,采用沃诺拉赞的经验性三联疗法也是首选。
该研究在大学医院医疗信息网络(UMIN000032351)中进行了回顾性注册。