Centre for Oncology Education and Research Translation (CONCERT) Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 23;18(1):845. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4729-3.
Routine assessment and clinical utilisation of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures can lead to improved patient outcomes. The PROMPT-Care eHealth system facilitates PRO data capture from cancer patients, data linkage and retrieval to support clinical decisions, patient self-management, and shared care. Pilot testing demonstrated acceptability and feasibility of PROMPT-Care Version 1.0. This study aims to implement PROMPT-Care Version 2.0 and determine its efficacy in reducing emergency department (ED) presentations, and improving chemotherapy delivery and health service referrals, compared to usual care.
Groups eligible to participate in the intervention arm of this controlled trial are patients receiving cancer care (including follow-up). PROMPT-Care patients will complete monthly assessments (distress, symptoms, unmet needs) until voluntary withdrawal or death. In Version 1.0, the care team accessed patients' clinical feedback reports in 'real time' to guide their care, and patients received links to support their self-management, tailored to their PRO responses. Version 2.0 was extended to include: i) an additional alert system notifying the care team of ongoing unresolved clinical issues, ii) patient self-management resources, and iii) an auto-populated Treatment Summary and Survivorship Care Plan (SCP). The control population will be patients extracted from hospital databases of the general cancer patient population who were seen at the participating cancer therapy centres during the study period, with a ratio of 1:4 of intervention to control patients. A minimum sample size of 1760 (352 intervention and 1408 control) patients will detect a 14% reduction in the number of ED presentations (primary outcome) in the PROMPT-Care group compared with the control group. Intervention patients will provide feedback on system usability and value of the self-management materials; oncology staff will provide feedback on usefulness of PROMPT-Care reports, response to clinical alerts, impact on routine care, and usefulness of the SCPs; and GPs will provide feedback on the usefulness of the SCPs and attitudes towards shared-care models of survivorship care planning.
This study will inform the PROMPT-Care system's impact on healthcare utilisation and utility as an alternative model for ongoing supportive care.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12616000615482 ) on 12th May 2016 ( www.anzctr.org.au ).
常规评估和临床利用患者报告的结果(PRO)测量可以改善患者的预后。PROMPT-Care 电子健康系统有助于从癌症患者那里获取 PRO 数据,进行数据链接和检索,以支持临床决策、患者自我管理和共享护理。试点测试证明了 PROMPT-Care 版本 1.0 的可接受性和可行性。本研究旨在实施 PROMPT-Care 版本 2.0,并确定其在减少急诊科(ED)就诊次数、改善化疗实施和卫生服务转诊方面的效果,与常规护理相比。
有资格参加这项对照试验干预组的患者正在接受癌症治疗(包括随访)。PROMPT-Care 患者将每月完成评估(压力、症状、未满足的需求),直到自愿退出或死亡。在版本 1.0 中,护理团队实时访问患者的临床反馈报告,以指导他们的护理,并且患者会收到支持他们自我管理的链接,这些链接根据他们的 PRO 反应量身定制。版本 2.0 扩展到包括:i)一个额外的警报系统,通知护理团队正在发生的未解决的临床问题,ii)患者自我管理资源,以及 iii)自动填充的治疗总结和生存护理计划(SCP)。对照组是从参与癌症治疗中心就诊的一般癌症患者人群的医院数据库中提取的患者,干预组与对照组的患者比例为 1:4。如果 PROMPT-Care 组比对照组减少 14%的 ED 就诊次数(主要结局),则需要 1760 名(352 名干预组和 1408 名对照组)患者的最小样本量。干预组患者将对系统可用性和自我管理材料的价值提供反馈;肿瘤学工作人员将对 PROMPT-Care 报告的有用性、对临床警报的反应、对常规护理的影响以及 SCP 的有用性提供反馈;全科医生将对 SCP 的有用性和对生存护理计划共享护理模式的态度提供反馈。
本研究将为 PROMPT-Care 系统对医疗保健利用的影响以及作为持续支持性护理的替代模式提供信息。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12616000615482)于 2016 年 5 月 12 日(www.anzctr.org.au)。