Suppr超能文献

先进治疗药物产品和健康技术评估——基于价值和可持续医疗保健的原则和实践。

Advanced therapy medicinal products and health technology assessment principles and practices for value-based and sustainable healthcare.

机构信息

Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.

Office of Health Economics, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Apr;20(3):427-438. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1007-x. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are beginning to reach European markets, and questions are being asked about their value for patients and how healthcare systems should pay for them.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and discuss potential challenges of ATMPs in view of current health technology assessment (HTA) methodology-specifically economic evaluation methods-in Europe as it relates to ATMPs, and to suggest potential solutions to these challenges.

METHODS

An Expert Panel reviewed current HTA principles and practices in relation to the specific characteristics of ATMPs.

RESULTS

Three key topics were identified and prioritised for discussion-uncertainty, discounting, and health outcomes and value. The panel discussed that evidence challenges linked to increased uncertainty may be mitigated by collection of follow-on data, use of value of information analysis, and/or outcomes-based contracts. For discount rates, an international, multi-disciplinary forum should be established to consider the economic, social and ethical implications of the choice of rate. Finally, consideration of the feasibility of assessing the value of ATMPs beyond health gain may also be key for decision-making.

CONCLUSIONS

ATMPs face a challenge in demonstrating their value within current HTA frameworks. Consideration of current HTA principles and practices with regards to the specific characteristics of ATMPs and continued dialogue will be key to ensuring appropriate market access.

CLASSIFICATION CODE

I.

摘要

背景

先进治疗药物产品(ATMPs)开始进入欧洲市场,人们开始质疑它们对患者的价值,以及医疗保健系统应该如何为其买单。

目的

鉴于欧洲目前特定于卫生技术评估(HTA)方法的经济评估方法,确定并讨论 ATMP 面临的潜在挑战,并为这些挑战提出潜在的解决方案。

方法

专家小组审查了与 ATMP 特定特征相关的当前 HTA 原则和实践。

结果

确定并优先讨论了三个关键主题——不确定性、贴现率以及健康结果和价值。专家组讨论了与增加的不确定性相关的证据挑战可以通过收集后续数据、使用信息价值分析和/或基于结果的合同来减轻。对于贴现率,应建立一个国际多学科论坛,以考虑选择贴现率的经济、社会和伦理影响。最后,考虑评估 ATMP 除健康收益之外的价值的可行性也可能是决策的关键。

结论

ATMP 在当前 HTA 框架内证明其价值面临挑战。考虑到 ATMP 的特定特征,对当前 HTA 原则和实践的考虑以及持续的对话将是确保适当市场准入的关键。

分类代码

I.

相似文献

1
Advanced therapy medicinal products and health technology assessment principles and practices for value-based and sustainable healthcare.
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Apr;20(3):427-438. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1007-x. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
2
Advanced therapy medicinal products: value judgement and ethical evaluation in health technology assessment.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Apr;21(3):311-320. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01147-x. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
5
Payer and Implementation Challenges with Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs).
BioDrugs. 2021 Jan;35(1):1-5. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00457-4.
7
Managing access to advanced therapy medicinal products: Challenges for NHS Wales.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;87(6):2444-2449. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14286. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
8
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
9
HTA methodology and value frameworks for evaluation and policy making for cell and gene therapies.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Dec;21(9):1421-1437. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01212-w. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
10
Value-based pricing for advanced therapy medicinal products: emerging affordability solutions.
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Mar;23(2):155-163. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01276-2. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacoeconomic Profiles of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 2;13(15):1894. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151894.
2
Challenges and solutions to the sustainability of gene and cell therapies.
Nat Rev Genet. 2025 Jul;26(7):437-438. doi: 10.1038/s41576-025-00827-0.
5
Market Access Challenges and Solutions in Cell and Gene Therapy in The Netherlands.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Jul 30;12(3):181-198. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12030015. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Cost of implementing CAR-T activity and managing CAR-T patients: an exploratory study.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10443-5.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Valuing health at the end of life: A review of stated preference studies in the social sciences literature.
Soc Sci Med. 2018 May;204:39-50. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.010. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
3
Gene therapy: evidence, value and affordability in the US health care system.
J Comp Eff Res. 2018 Jan;7(1):15-28. doi: 10.2217/cer-2017-0068. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
4
Marketing authorisation of orphan medicines in Europe from 2000 to 2013.
Drug Discov Today. 2018 Feb;23(2):424-433. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
8
Accounting for Cured Patients in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):705-709. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
10
Time to Review the Role of Surrogate End Points in Health Policy: State of the Art and the Way Forward.
Value Health. 2017 Mar;20(3):487-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验