Kid Risk, Inc., Columbus, OH, USA.
Risk Anal. 2019 Feb;39(2):389-401. doi: 10.1111/risa.13194. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
Only Pakistan and Afghanistan reported any polio cases caused by serotype 1 wild polioviruses (WPV1s) in 2017. With the dwindling cases in both countries and pressure to finish eradication with the least possible resources, a danger exists of inappropriate prioritization of efforts between the two countries and insufficient investment in the two countries to finish the job. We used an existing differential-equation-based poliovirus transmission and oral poliovirus (OPV) evolution model to simulate a proactive strategy to stop transmission, and different hypothetical reactive strategies that adapt the quality of supplemental immunization activities (SIAs) in response to observed polio cases in Pakistan and Afghanistan. To account for the delay in perception and adaptation, we related the coverage of the SIAs in high-risk, undervaccinated subpopulations to the perceived (i.e., smoothed) polio incidence. Continuation of the current frequency and quality of SIAs remains insufficient to eradicate WPV1 in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Proactive strategies that significantly improve and sustain SIA quality lead to WPV1 eradication and the prevention of circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus (cVDPV) outbreaks. Reactive vaccination efforts that adapt moderately quickly and independently to changes in polio incidence in each country may succeed in WPV1 interruption after several cycles of outbreaks, or may interrupt WPV1 transmission in one country but subsequently import WPV1 from the other country or enable the emergence of cVDPV outbreaks. Reactive vaccination efforts that adapt independently and either more rapidly or more slowly to changes in polio incidence in each country may similarly fail to interrupt WPV1 transmission and result in oscillations of the incidence. Reactive strategies that divert resources to the country of highest priority may lead to alternating large outbreaks. Achieving WPV1 eradication and subsequent successful OPV cessation in Pakistan and Afghanistan requires proactive and sustained efforts to improve vaccination intensity in under-vaccinated subpopulations while maintaining high population immunity elsewhere.
2017 年,仅有巴基斯坦和阿富汗报告了由 1 型野生脊灰病毒(WPV1)引起的脊灰病例。随着两国病例数量的减少,以及在尽可能少的资源下完成根除工作的压力,两国之间存在着努力主次不当和对两国投入不足的危险,无法完成这项工作。我们使用现有的基于微分方程的脊灰病毒传播和口服脊灰疫苗(OPV)进化模型,模拟了一种主动策略来阻止传播,并模拟了不同的假设性反应策略,这些策略根据巴基斯坦和阿富汗观察到的脊灰病例,调整补充免疫活动(SIA)的质量。为了考虑到认知和适应的延迟,我们将高风险、疫苗接种不足人群的 SIA 覆盖率与感知到的(即平滑的)脊灰发病率联系起来。继续目前的 SIA 频率和质量仍然不足以在巴基斯坦和阿富汗根除 WPV1。主动策略可显著提高和维持 SIA 质量,从而根除 WPV1 并防止循环疫苗衍生脊灰病毒(cVDPV)暴发。对每个国家脊灰发病率变化做出适度快速和独立反应的反应性疫苗接种工作,可能会在几次暴发周期后成功中断 WPV1 传播,或者可能会在一个国家中断 WPV1 传播,但随后从另一个国家输入 WPV1 或使 cVDPV 暴发的出现成为可能。对每个国家脊灰发病率变化做出独立、反应速度更快或更慢的反应性疫苗接种工作,也可能无法中断 WPV1 传播,并导致发病率的波动。将资源转移到优先级最高的国家的反应性策略可能会导致交替出现大规模暴发。在巴基斯坦和阿富汗实现 WPV1 根除和随后成功停用 OPV,需要积极主动和持续努力,改善疫苗接种不足人群的疫苗接种强度,同时保持其他地区的高人群免疫力。