Department of Radiology, Imaging Division, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Mar;81(3):1659-1670. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27519. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
Assess the potential gain in acceleration performance of a 256-channel versus 32-channel receive coil array at 7 T in combination with a 2D CAIPIRINHA sequence for 3D data sets.
A 256-channel receive setup was simulated by placing 2 small 16-channel high-density receive arrays at 2 8 different locations on the head of healthy participants. Multiple consecutive measurements were performed and coil sensitivity maps were combined to form a complete 256-channel data set. This setup was compared with a standard 32-channel head coil, in terms of SNR, noise correlation, and acceleration performance (g-factor).
In the periphery of the brain, the receive SNR was on average a factor 1.5 higher (ranging up to a factor 2.7 higher) than the 32-channel coil; in the center of the brain the SNR was comparable or lower, depending on the size of the region of interest, with a factor 1.0 on average (ranging from 0.7 up to a factor of 1.6). The average noise correlation between coil elements was 3% for the 256-channel coil, and 5% for the 32-channel coil. At acceptable g-factors (< 2), the achievable acceleration factor using SENSE and 2D CAIPIRINHA was 24 and 28, respectively, versus 9 and 12 for the 32-channel coil.
The receive performance of the simulated 256 channel array was better than the 32-channel reference. Combined with 2D CAIPIRINHA, a peak acceleration factor of 28 was assessed, showing great potential for high-density receive arrays.
评估在 7T 下结合 2D CAIPIRINHA 序列对 3D 数据集进行成像时,256 通道与 32 通道接收线圈阵列在加速性能方面的潜在增益。
通过将两个小的 16 通道高密度接收阵列放置在健康参与者头部的 8 个不同位置,模拟了一个 256 通道接收设置。进行了多次连续测量,并将线圈灵敏度图组合起来形成一个完整的 256 通道数据集。该设置在信噪比、噪声相关性和加速性能(g 因子)方面与标准的 32 通道头部线圈进行了比较。
在大脑的外围,接收 SNR 平均高出 1.5 倍(最高可达 2.7 倍);在大脑中心,SNR 则取决于感兴趣区域的大小,平均而言相当或更低,平均为 1.0(范围从 0.7 到 1.6 倍)。256 通道线圈的线圈元件之间的平均噪声相关性为 3%,32 通道线圈为 5%。在可接受的 g 因子(<2)下,使用 SENSE 和 2D CAIPIRINHA 可分别实现 24 和 28 的加速因子,而 32 通道线圈分别为 9 和 12。
模拟的 256 通道阵列的接收性能优于 32 通道参考。结合 2D CAIPIRINHA,评估了峰值加速因子为 28,表明高密度接收阵列具有很大的潜力。