Mottola Michelle F, Davenport Margie H, Ruchat Stephanie-May, Davies Gregory A, Poitras Veronica, Gray Casey, Jaramillo Garcia Alejandra, Barrowman Nick, Adamo Kristi B, Duggan Mary, Barakat Ruben, Chilibeck Phil, Fleming Karen, Forte Milena, Korolnek Jillian, Nagpal Taniya, Slater Linda, Stirling Deanna, Zehr Lori
London, ON.
Edmonton, AB (Chair).
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Nov;40(11):1528-1537. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
The objective is to provide guidance for pregnant women, and obstetric care and exercise professionals, on prenatal physical activity.
The outcomes evaluated were maternal, fetal, or neonatal morbidity or fetal mortality during and following pregnancy.
Literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full-text, Child Development & Adolescent Studies, ERIC, Sport Discus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Trip Database from database inception up to January 6, 2017. Primary studies of any design were eligible, except case studies. Results were limited to English, Spanish, or French language materials. Articles related to maternal physical activity during pregnancy reporting on maternal, fetal, or neonatal morbidity or fetal mortality were eligible for inclusion. The quality of evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology.
The Guidelines Consensus Panel solicited feedback from end-users (obstetric care providers, exercise professionals, researchers, policy organizations, and pregnant and postpartum women). The development of this guideline followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument.
BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: The benefits of prenatal physical activity are moderate, and no harms were identified; therefore, the difference between desirable and undesirable consequences (net benefit) is expected to be moderate. The majority of stakeholders and end-users indicated that following these recommendations would be feasible, acceptable, and equitable. Following these recommendations is likely to require minimal resources from both individual and health systems perspectives.
This guideline provide evidence-based recommendations regarding physical activity throughout pregnancy in the promotion of maternal, fetal, and neonatal health. In the absence of contraindications (see later for a detailed list), following this guideline is associated with: (1) fewer newborn complications (i.e., large for gestational age); and (2) maternal health benefits (i.e., decreased risk of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, Caesarean section, instrumental delivery, urinary incontinence, excessive gestational weight gain, and depression; improved blood glucose; decreased total gestational weight gain; and decreased severity of depressive symptoms and lumbopelvic pain). Physical activity is not associated with miscarriage, stillbirth, neonatal death, preterm birth, preterm/prelabour rupture of membranes, neonatal hypoglycemia, low birth weight, birth defects, induction of labour, or birth complications. In general, more physical activity (frequency, duration, and/or volume) is associated with greater benefits. However, evidence was not identified regarding the safety or additional benefit of exercising at levels significantly above the recommendations. Prenatal physical activity should be considered a front-line therapy for reducing the risk of pregnancy complications and enhancing maternal physical and mental health. For pregnant women not currently meeting this guideline, a progressive adjustment toward them is recommended. Previously active women may continue physical activity throughout pregnancy. Women may need to modify physical activity as pregnancy progresses. There may be periods when following the guideline is not possible due to fatigue and/or discomforts of pregnancy; women are encouraged to do what they can and to return to following the recommendations when they are able. This guideline were informed by an extensive systematic review of the literature, expert opinion, end-user consultation and considerations of feasibility, acceptability, costs, and equity.
The specific recommendations in this 2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity Throughout Pregnancy are provided below with corresponding statements indicating the quality of the evidence informing the recommendations and the strength of the recommendations (explanations follow).
All pregnant women can participate in physical activity throughout pregnancy with the exception of those who have contraindications (listed below). Women with absolute contraindications may continue their usual activities of daily living but should not participate in more strenuous activities. Women with relative contraindications should discuss the advantages and disadvantages of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity with their obstetric care provider prior to participation. Absolute contraindications to exercise are the following: Relative contraindications to exercise are the following: STRENGTH OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS: The GRADE system was utilized to grade the strength of the recommendations. Recommendations are rated as strong or weak based on the: (1) balance between benefits and harms; (2) overall quality of the evidence; (3) importance of outcomes (i.e., values and preferences of pregnant women); (4) use of resources (i.e., cost); (5) impact on health equity; (6) feasibility, and (7) acceptability. Strong recommendation: Most or all pregnant women will be best served by the recommended course of action. Weak recommendation: Not all pregnant women will be best served by the recommended course of action; there is a need to consider other factors such as the individual's circumstances, preferences, values, resources available, or setting. Consultation with an obstetric care provider may assist in decision-making.
The quality of the evidence refers to the level of confidence in the evidence and ranges from very low to high. High quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel is very confident that the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome is close to the true effect. Moderate quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel is moderately confident in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome; the estimate of the effect is likely to be close to the true effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. Low quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel's confidence in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome is limited; the estimate of the effect may be substantially different from the true effect. Very low quality: The Guideline Consensus Panel has very little confidence in the estimated effect of physical activity on the health outcome; the estimate of the effect is likely to be substantially different from the true effect. This was a weak recommendation because the quality of evidence was low, and the net benefit between women who were physically active and those who were not was small. This was a strong recommendation because, despite low quality evidence supporting physical activity during pregnancy for women categorized as overweight or obese, there was evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrating an improvement in gestational weight gain and blood glucose. Moderate-intensity physical activity is intense enough to noticeably increase heart rate; a person can talk but not sing during activities of this intensity. Examples of moderate-intensity physical activity include brisk walking, water aerobics, stationary cycling (moderate effort), resistance training, carrying moderate loads, and household chores (e.g., gardening, washing windows). This was a weak recommendation because urinary incontinence was was not rated as a "critical" outcome and the evidence was low quality. This was a weak recommendation because: (1) the quality of evidence was very low; and (2) although harms were investigated there was limited available information to inform the balance of benefits and harms. This recommendation was primarily based on expert opinion.
旨在为孕妇、产科护理人员及运动专业人士提供孕期身体活动方面的指导。
评估的结果为孕期及产后的母体、胎儿或新生儿发病率或胎儿死亡率。
通过检索以下数据库获取文献:Medline、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Cochrane系统评价数据库、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库、Scopus、科学引文索引核心合集、CINAHL Plus全文数据库、儿童发展与青少年研究数据库、教育资源信息中心、体育文摘数据库、ClinicalTrials.gov以及循证医学数据库,检索时间跨度从各数据库建库至2017年1月6日。除病例研究外,任何设计的原发性研究均符合纳入标准。结果仅限于英文、西班牙文或法文资料。纳入与孕期母体身体活动相关且报告了母体、胎儿或新生儿发病率或胎儿死亡率的文章。使用推荐分级的评估、制定和评价(GRADE)方法对证据质量进行评级。
指南共识小组征求了最终用户(产科护理人员、运动专业人士、研究人员、政策组织以及孕妇和产后妇女)的反馈。本指南的制定遵循研究评价指南评估(AGREE)II工具。
益处、危害及成本:孕期身体活动的益处为中等程度,未发现危害;因此,预期的理想与不良后果之间的差异(净效益)为中等。大多数利益相关者和最终用户表示,遵循这些建议是可行、可接受且公平的。从个人和卫生系统角度来看,遵循这些建议可能所需资源极少。
本指南提供了基于证据的关于孕期身体活动促进母体、胎儿和新生儿健康的建议。在无禁忌症的情况下(详细列表见后文),遵循本指南与以下情况相关:(1)减少新生儿并发症(即大于胎龄儿);(2)对母体健康有益(即降低先兆子痫、妊娠期高血压、妊娠期糖尿病、剖宫产、器械助产、尿失禁、孕期体重过度增加和抑郁症的风险;改善血糖;减少孕期总体体重增加;减轻抑郁症状和腰骶部疼痛的严重程度)。身体活动与流产、死产、新生儿死亡、早产、胎膜早破/临产前胎膜破裂、新生儿低血糖、低出生体重、出生缺陷、引产或分娩并发症无关。一般而言,更多的身体活动(频率、持续时间和/或量)与更大的益处相关。然而,未找到关于显著高于建议水平运动的安全性或额外益处的证据。孕期身体活动应被视为降低妊娠并发症风险及增强母体身心健康的一线疗法。对于目前未达到本指南要求的孕妇,建议逐步向其调整。既往活跃的女性在整个孕期可继续进行身体活动。随着孕期进展,女性可能需要调整身体活动。由于孕期疲劳和/或不适,可能会有无法遵循本指南的时期;鼓励女性尽所能,并在能够做到时恢复遵循建议。本指南基于对文献的广泛系统评价、专家意见、最终用户咨询以及对可行性、可接受性、成本和公平性的考虑。
以下是2019年加拿大孕期身体活动指南中的具体建议,并附有相应说明,表明为建议提供依据的证据质量和建议强度(后续有解释)。
除有禁忌症(如下所列)的孕妇外,所有孕妇均可在孕期参与身体活动。有绝对禁忌症的女性可继续其日常活动,但不应参与更剧烈的活动。有相对禁忌症的女性在参与前应与产科护理人员讨论中等至剧烈强度身体活动的利弊。运动的绝对禁忌症如下:运动的相对禁忌症如下:建议强度:采用GRADE系统对建议强度进行分级。根据以下因素将建议评为强或弱:(1)利弊平衡;(2)证据的总体质量;(3)结果的重要性(即孕妇的价值观和偏好);(4)资源使用(即成本);(5)对健康公平性的影响;(6)可行性;(7)可接受性。强推荐:大多数或所有孕妇采用推荐的行动方案将获得最佳效果。弱推荐:并非所有孕妇采用推荐的行动方案都能获得最佳效果;需要考虑其他因素,如个人情况、偏好、价值观、可用资源或环境。咨询产科护理人员可能有助于决策。
证据质量指对证据的信心程度,范围从极低到高。高质量:指南共识小组非常确信身体活动对健康结果的估计效果接近真实效果。中等质量:指南共识小组对身体活动对健康结果的估计效果有一定信心;效果估计可能接近真实效果,但有可能存在显著差异。低质量:指南共识小组对身体活动对健康结果的估计效果信心有限;效果估计可能与真实效果有显著差异。极低质量:指南共识小组对身体活动对健康结果的估计效果信心极低;效果估计很可能与真实效果有显著差异。这是一个弱推荐,因为证据质量低,且身体活动组与非身体活动组女性之间的净效益较小。这是一个强推荐,因为尽管支持超重或肥胖女性孕期身体活动的证据质量低,但随机对照试验有证据表明孕期体重增加和血糖有所改善。中等强度身体活动强度足以显著提高心率;在此强度活动时,一个人能说话但不能唱歌。中等强度身体活动的例子包括快走、水中有氧运动、固定自行车(中等强度)、阻力训练、搬运中等重量物品以及家务劳动(如园艺、擦窗户)。这是一个弱推荐,因为尿失禁未被评为“关键”结果且证据质量低。这是一个弱推荐,原因如下:(1)证据质量极低;(2)尽管对危害进行了调查,但用于权衡利弊的可用信息有限。本推荐主要基于专家意见。