Zhang Wang, Zhang Yuntao, Fang Qiang
Department of Critical Care Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, China. Corresponding author: Fang Qiang, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Sep;30(9):836-841. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.09.004.
To investigate the meaning and molecular mechanisms of Galectin-9/T-cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 (Tim-3) pathway on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced murine macrophage M1/M2 subtype polarization.
The murine peritoneal macrophages RAW264.7 were cultured in vitro until the cells had matured with 80%-90% fusion rate. (1) The cells were cultured in serum-free medium and treated with 0 (blank control), 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 mg/L LPS for 24 hours. Real-time fluorescence quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) or Western Blot was used to determine the expressions of M1 macrophage markers such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and M2 macrophage markers such as arginase-1 (Arg-1), leukocyte differentiation antigen 206 (CD206), as well as Tim-3 and Galectin-9 in the cells. (2) The other mice peritoneal macrophages were divided into blank control group (cultured in serum-free DMEM medium for 24 hours), LPS treatment group (cultured in serum-free DMEM medium containing 0.1 mg/L LPS for 24 hours) and α-lactose pretreatment group (pretreated with serum-free DMEM containing 40 μmol/L Galectin-9 signal antagonist 1 hour before LPS stimulation). Over closed Galectin-9 signal was used to verify the role of Galectin-9 in macrophage M1/M2 subtype polarization.
(1) After stimulation with low concentrations of LPS (0.01 mg/L, 0.1 mg/L) for 24 hours, the expression of M1 markers was only slightly increased such as iNOS mRNA or not significantly changed such as IL-6 mRNA in macrophages, while the expressions of M2 markers such as Arg-1 mRNA and CD206 mRNA were significantly increased and peaked at LPS concentrations of 0.1 mg/L and 0.01 mg/L [compared with blank control group: Arg-1 mRNA (2) was 1.85±0.07 vs. 1.00±0.02, CD206 mRNA (2) was 2.03±0.11 vs.1.00±0.05, both P < 0.01]. With the increase of LPS concentration, the expressions of IL-6 mRNA and iNOS mRNA continued to increase, while the expressions of Arg-1 mRNA and CD206 mRNA were gradually decreased, and the macrophage M1/M2 subtype polarization status changed. At the same time, the level of Tim-3 protein in macrophages was significantly up-regulated after stimulation with 0.01 mg/L LPS as compared with that of blank control group (Tim-3/GAPDH: 0.84±0.04 vs. 0.69±0.02, P < 0.01), peaked at LPS concentrations of 0.1 mg/L, and then decreased with increasing LPS concentration. The intracellular Galectin-9 and supernatant secreted Galectin-9 (s-Galectin-9) protein levels showed no significant change after stimulation with low concentrations of LPS (0.01 mg/L, 0.1 mg/L), while then gradually decreased with the increase of LPS concentration. (2) Compared with blank control group, the mRNA expressions of M1 marker iNOS and M2 markers Arg-1 and CD206 were significantly increased in LPS treatment group, but IL-6 mRNA level was not changed significantly. The mRNA levels of IL-6 and iNOS were further elevated after pretreatment with α-lactose as compared with that of the LPS treatment group [IL-6 mRNA (2): 1.44±0.02 vs. 1.14±0.11, iNOS mRNA (2): 2.45±0.04 vs. 2.01±0.08, both P < 0.01], while the mRNA levels of Arg-1 and CD206 were significantly decreased [Arg-1 mRNA (2): 0.75±0.01 vs. 1.85±0.02, CD206 mRNA (2): 0.58±0.02 vs. 2.03±0.14, both P < 0.01]. Meanwhile, the blocking of Galectin-9 signaling could also reduce the extracellular s-Galectin-9 (compared with LPS treatment group: s-Galectin-9/GAPDH was 0.10±0.01 vs. 0.23±0.02, P < 0.01), down-regulated the expressions of Tim-3 and Galectin-9 (Tim-3/GAPDH: 0.28±0.01 vs. 0.43±0.01, Galectin-9/GAPDH: 0.21±0.01 vs. 0.43±0.01, both P < 0.01).
LPS regulates macrophage M1/M2 subtype polarization via Galectin-9/Tim-3 signaling pathway. Low-doses of LPS can limit the development of inflammation by accommodating the expression and secretion of Galectin-9 to polarize macrophages to M2. High-doses of LPS promotes the development of inflammation by down-regulating the expression and secretion of Galectin-9 to polarize macrophages to M1.
探讨半乳糖凝集素-9/ T细胞免疫球蛋白黏蛋白-3(Tim-3)通路在脂多糖(LPS)诱导的小鼠巨噬细胞M1/M2亚型极化中的意义及分子机制。
体外培养小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞RAW264.7,直至细胞融合率达到80%-90%成熟。(1)将细胞培养于无血清培养基中,分别用0(空白对照)、0.01、0.1、1、10和100 mg/L LPS处理24小时。采用实时荧光定量逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)或蛋白质免疫印迹法检测细胞中M1巨噬细胞标志物如白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)以及M2巨噬细胞标志物如精氨酸酶-1(Arg-1)、白细胞分化抗原206(CD206),以及Tim-3和半乳糖凝集素-9的表达。(2)将另一些小鼠腹腔巨噬细胞分为空白对照组(在无血清DMEM培养基中培养24小时)、LPS处理组(在含0.1 mg/L LPS的无血清DMEM培养基中培养24小时)和α-乳糖预处理组(在LPS刺激前1小时用含40 μmol/L半乳糖凝集素-9信号拮抗剂的无血清DMEM预处理)。通过封闭半乳糖凝集素-9信号来验证其在巨噬细胞M1/M2亚型极化中的作用。
(1)用低浓度LPS(0.01 mg/L、0.1 mg/L)刺激24小时后,巨噬细胞中M1标志物如iNOS mRNA的表达仅略有增加,而IL-6 mRNA表达无明显变化,而M2标志物如Arg-1 mRNA和CD206 mRNA的表达显著增加,并在LPS浓度为0.1 mg/L和0.01 mg/L时达到峰值[与空白对照组相比:Arg-1 mRNA(2)为1.85±0.07 vs. 1.00±0.02,CD206 mRNA(2)为2.03±0.11 vs.1.00±0.05,均P < 0.01]。随着LPS浓度的增加,IL-6 mRNA和iNOS mRNA的表达持续增加,而Arg-1 mRNA和CD206 mRNA的表达逐渐降低,巨噬细胞M1/M2亚型极化状态发生改变。同时,与空白对照组相比,0.01 mg/L LPS刺激后巨噬细胞中Tim-3蛋白水平显著上调(Tim-3/GAPDH:0.84±0.04 vs. 0.69±0.02,P < 0.01),在LPS浓度为0.1 mg/L时达到峰值,随后随LPS浓度增加而降低。低浓度LPS(0.01 mg/L、0.1 mg/L)刺激后,细胞内半乳糖凝集素-9和上清液分泌的半乳糖凝集素-9(s-Galectin-9)蛋白水平无明显变化,随后随LPS浓度增加而逐渐降低。(2)与空白对照组相比,LPS处理组M1标志物iNOS和M2标志物Arg-1及CD206的mRNA表达显著增加,但IL-6 mRNA水平无明显变化。与LPS处理组相比,α-乳糖预处理后IL-6和iNOS的mRNA水平进一步升高[IL-6 mRNA(2):1.44±0.02 vs. 1.14±0.11,iNOS mRNA(2):2.45±0.04 vs. 2.01±0.08,均P < 0.01],而Arg-1和CD206的mRNA水平显著降低[Arg-1 mRNA(2):0.75±0.01 vs. 1.85±0.02,CD206 mRNA(2):0.58±0.02 vs. 2.03±0.14,均P < 0.01]。同时,封闭半乳糖凝集素-9信号也可降低细胞外s-Galectin-9(与LPS处理组相比:s-Galectin-9/GAPDH为0.10±0.01 vs. 0.23±0.02,P < 0.01),下调Tim-3和半乳糖凝集素-9的表达(Tim-3/GAPDH:0.28±0.01 vs. 0.43±0.01,Galectin-9/GAPDH:0.21±0.01 vs. 0.43±0.01,均P < 0.01)。
LPS通过半乳糖凝集素-9/Tim-3信号通路调节巨噬细胞M1/M2亚型极化。低剂量LPS可通过调节半乳糖凝集素-9的表达和分泌,使巨噬细胞向M2极化,从而限制炎症发展。高剂量LPS则通过下调半乳糖凝集素-9的表达和分泌,使巨噬细胞向M1极化,促进炎症发展。