MOE Key Laboratory of Laser Life Science & College of Life Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
J Microsc. 2018 Nov;272(2):145-150. doi: 10.1111/jmi.12755. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
We recently developed two quantitative fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) measurement methods based on spectral unmixing of emission spectra (IIem-spFRET) and excitation-emission spectra (ExEm-spFRET), respectively. We here evaluated robustness of the two methods by implementing them on a self-assembled quantitative FRET measurement system using the cells expressing different constructs. For the cells with larger signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio (>9), the two methods obtained consistent FRET efficiency (E) values and total concentration ratio (R) values of acceptor to donor for all constructs; for the cells with 3 < S/N < 9, IIem-spFRET obtained bigger R values than the expected value for VCV construct; for the cells with S/N < 3, although IIem-spFRET method obtained inaccurate E and R values for VCV construct, the two methods also obtained consistent E and R values for all other constructs. Collectively, both ExEm-spFRET and IIem-spFRET methods are very applicable for live-cell FRET measurement, and ExEm-spFRET has superior robustness especially for the cells with low S/N ratio. LAY DESCRIPTION: Fluorescent proteins (FPs)-based fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) has been widely used as a powerful technique to study protein-protein interaction and stoichiometry of macromolecular complexes in living cells. There are two key issues for quantitative FRET measurement especially in living cells: donor emission crosstalk (donor fluorescence is collected in acceptor detection channel) and acceptor excitation crosstalk (acceptor is excited directly under donor excitation) due to the spectral overlap of FPs. Two-wavelengths excitation-based spectral linear unmixing of emission spectra can resolve donor emission crosstalk due to the obvious difference in emission spectra between donor and acceptor, but additional reference is necessary for the correction of acceptor excitation crosstalk. Spectral unmixing of excitation-emission spectra has inherent ability to resolve donor emission crosstalk and acceptor excitation crosstalk simultaneously without additional reference. We recently developed two quantitative FRET measurement methods based on spectral unmixing of emission spectra (IIem-spFRET) and excitation-emission spectra (ExEm-spFRET), respectively. We here evaluate robustness of the two methods by implementing them on a self-assembled quantitative FRET measurement system using the same cells expressing different constructs under different signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios. For the cells with S/N > 9, the two methods obtained consistent FRET efficiency (E) values and total concentration ratio (R) values of acceptor to donor for all constructs; for the cells with 3 < S/N < 9, IIem-spFRET obtained bigger R values than the expected value for VCV construct; for the cells with S/N < 3, although IIem-spFRET method obtained inaccurate E and R values for VCV construct, the two methods also obtained consistent E and R values for all other constructs. Collectively, our experimental results demonstrate that both ExEm-spFRET and IIem-spFRET methods are very applicable for live-cell FRET measurement, and ExEm-spFRET has superior robustness especially for the cells high E and low S/N ratio.
我们最近开发了两种基于发射光谱光谱解混(IIem-spFRET)和激发-发射光谱光谱解混(ExEm-spFRET)的定量荧光共振能量转移(FRET)测量方法。我们在这里通过在使用不同构建体表达的细胞的自组装定量 FRET 测量系统上实施这两种方法来评估它们的稳健性。对于信号噪声比(S/N)大于 9 的细胞,两种方法都获得了所有构建体的一致 FRET 效率(E)值和受体与供体的总浓度比(R)值;对于 S/N 为 3 < 9 的细胞,IIem-spFRET 为 VCV 构建体获得了比预期更大的 R 值;对于 S/N < 3 的细胞,尽管 IIem-spFRET 方法为 VCV 构建体获得了不准确的 E 和 R 值,但两种方法也为所有其他构建体获得了一致的 E 和 R 值。总的来说,ExEm-spFRET 和 IIem-spFRET 方法都非常适用于活细胞 FRET 测量,特别是对于 S/N 较低的细胞,ExEm-spFRET 具有更高的稳健性。
基于荧光蛋白(FP)的荧光共振能量转移(FRET)已广泛应用于研究活细胞中蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用和大分子复合物的化学计量。定量 FRET 测量有两个关键问题,特别是在活细胞中:由于 FP 的光谱重叠,供体发射串扰(供体荧光在受体检测通道中收集)和受体激发串扰(在供体激发下直接激发受体)。基于双波长激发的发射光谱线性解混可以解决由于供体和受体之间发射光谱明显差异而导致的供体发射串扰问题,但需要额外的参考来校正受体激发串扰。激发-发射光谱的光谱解混具有内在的能力来同时解决供体发射串扰和受体激发串扰,而无需额外的参考。我们最近开发了两种定量 FRET 测量方法,分别基于发射光谱的光谱解混(IIem-spFRET)和激发-发射光谱的光谱解混(ExEm-spFRET)。我们在这里通过在使用相同细胞的自组装定量 FRET 测量系统上实施这两种方法来评估它们的稳健性,这些细胞在不同的信号噪声(S/N)比下表达不同的构建体。对于 S/N > 9 的细胞,两种方法都获得了所有构建体的一致的 FRET 效率(E)值和受体与供体的总浓度比(R)值;对于 3 < S/N < 9 的细胞,IIem-spFRET 为 VCV 构建体获得了比预期更大的 R 值;对于 S/N < 3 的细胞,尽管 IIem-spFRET 方法为 VCV 构建体获得了不准确的 E 和 R 值,但两种方法也为所有其他构建体获得了一致的 E 和 R 值。总的来说,我们的实验结果表明,ExEm-spFRET 和 IIem-spFRET 方法都非常适用于活细胞 FRET 测量,特别是对于 E 值高、S/N 低的细胞,ExEm-spFRET 具有更高的稳健性。