Suppr超能文献

种族和民族差异与糖尿病风险因素的人体测量指标。

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Anthropometric Measures as Risk Factors for Diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(1):126-133. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1413. Epub 2018 Oct 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to examine the impact of race/ethnicity on associations between anthropometric measures and diabetes risk.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 136,112 postmenopausal women aged 50-79 years participating in the Women's Health Initiative without baseline cancer or diabetes were followed for 14.6 years. BMI, waist circumference (WC), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were measured in all participants, and a subset of 9,695 had assessment of whole-body fat mass, whole-body percent fat, trunk fat mass, and leg fat mass by DXA. Incident diabetes was assessed via self-report. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess associations between anthropometrics and diabetes incidence.

RESULTS

During follow-up, 18,706 cases of incident diabetes were identified. BMI, WC, and WHR were all positively associated with diabetes risk in each racial and ethnic group. WC had the strongest association with risk of diabetes across all racial and ethnic groups. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, associations with WC were weaker in black women ( < 0.0001) and stronger in Asian women ( < 0.0001). Among women with DXA determinations, black women had a weaker association with whole-body fat ( = 0.02) but a stronger association with trunk-to-leg fat ratio ( = 0.03) compared with white women.

CONCLUSIONS

In postmenopausal women across all racial/ethnic groups, WC was a better predictor of diabetes risk, especially for Asian women. Better anthropometric measures that reflect trunk-to-leg fat ratio may improve diabetes risk assessment for black women.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨种族/民族对人体测量指标与糖尿病风险之间关联的影响。

研究设计和方法

共有 136112 名年龄在 50-79 岁、无基线癌症或糖尿病的绝经后妇女参加了妇女健康倡议,随访时间为 14.6 年。所有参与者均测量了 BMI、腰围(WC)和腰臀比(WHR),其中 9695 名参与者进行了全身脂肪量、全身脂肪百分比、躯干脂肪量和腿部脂肪量的 DXA 评估。通过自我报告评估新发糖尿病。采用多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估人体测量指标与糖尿病发病风险之间的关联。

结果

在随访期间,共发生 18706 例新发糖尿病。在每个种族和民族群体中,BMI、WC 和 WHR 均与糖尿病风险呈正相关。在所有种族和民族群体中,WC 与糖尿病风险的相关性最强。与非西班牙裔白人相比,WC 与黑人女性(<0.0001)和亚洲女性(<0.0001)的糖尿病风险相关性较弱。在进行 DXA 测定的女性中,与白种女性相比,黑种女性与全身脂肪的相关性较弱(=0.02),与躯干-腿部脂肪比的相关性较强(=0.03)。

结论

在所有种族/民族群体的绝经后妇女中,WC 是预测糖尿病风险的更好指标,尤其是对于亚洲女性。更好的人体测量指标,反映躯干-腿部脂肪比,可能会改善对黑人女性的糖尿病风险评估。

相似文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Anthropometric Measures as Risk Factors for Diabetes.
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(1):126-133. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1413. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
3
Racial differences in anthropometric measures as risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer.
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Dec;33(12):1413-1419. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01630-6. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
DXA Versus Clinical Measures of Adiposity as Predictors of Cardiometabolic Diseases and All-Cause Mortality in Postmenopausal Women.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Nov;96(11):2831-2842. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.04.027. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
7
Longitudinal association of measures of adiposity with serum antioxidant concentrations in postmenopausal women.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Jan;70(1):47-53. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.74. Epub 2015 May 27.
8
How does ethnicity affect the association between obesity and diabetes?
Diabet Med. 2007 Nov;24(11):1199-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02244.x. Epub 2007 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Anthropometric Indices and Diabetes Disease: Based on the Rafsanjan Cohort Study.
Int J Prev Med. 2025 Jul 30;16:47. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_298_23. eCollection 2025.
5
The association between waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) with diabetes in the PERSIAN Guilan cohort study population.
BMC Endocr Disord. 2024 Jul 15;24(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12902-024-01641-1.
9
Obesity-related indicators and tuberculosis: A Mendelian randomization study.
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0297905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297905. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Best anthropometric discriminators of incident type 2 diabetes among white and black adults: A longitudinal ARIC study.
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 31;12(1):e0168282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168282. eCollection 2017.
2
Visual Representation of Body Shape in African-American and European American Women: Clinical Considerations.
Clin Med Insights Womens Health. 2016 Jul 20;9(Suppl 1):63-70. doi: 10.4137/CMWH.S37587. eCollection 2016.
3
BMI cut points to identify at-risk Asian Americans for type 2 diabetes screening.
Diabetes Care. 2015 Jan;38(1):150-8. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2391.
4
Optimal cut-off values of BMI, waist circumference and waist:height ratio for defining obesity in Chinese adults.
Br J Nutr. 2014 Nov 28;112(10):1735-44. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514002657. Epub 2014 Oct 10.
6
Ratio of trunk to leg volume as a new body shape metric for diabetes and mortality.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 10;8(7):e68716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068716. Print 2013.
8
Pathophysiology of human visceral obesity: an update.
Physiol Rev. 2013 Jan;93(1):359-404. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2011.
10
Self-reported diabetes is a valid outcome in pragmatic clinical trials and observational studies.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Mar;66(3):349-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 May 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验