Suppr超能文献

前列腺素E1联合甲钴胺与前列腺素E1单药治疗糖尿病周围神经病变患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Prostaglandin E1 plus methylcobalamin combination therapy versus prostaglandin E1 monotherapy for patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Jiang De-Qi, Zhao Shi-Hua, Li Ming-Xing, Jiang Li-Lin, Wang Yong, Wang Yan

机构信息

College of Biology and Pharmacy, Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agricultural Resources Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yulin Normal University, Yulin.

Department of Pharmacy, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(44):e13020. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prostaglandin E1 (P) or methylcobalamin (M) treatment has been suggested as a therapeutic approach for diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in many clinical trial reports. However, the combined effects of 2 drugs still remain dubious.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this report was to evaluate the efficacy of M plus P (M + P) for the treatment of DPN compared with that of P monotherapy, in order to provide a reference resource for rational drug use.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of M + P for DPN published up to September 2017 were searched. Risk ratio (RR), mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with the I test. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were also performed. The outcomes measured were as follows: the clinical efficacy, median motor nerve conduction velocities (MNCV), median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), peroneal MNCV, peroneal SNCV, and adverse effects.

RESULTS

Sixteen RCTs with 1136 participants were included. Clinical efficacy of M + P combination therapy was significantly better than P monotherapy (fifteen trials; RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.18-1.32, P < .00001, I = 27%). Compared with P monotherapy, the pooled effects of M + P combination therapy on nerve conduction velocity were (MD 6.29, 95% CI 4.63-7.94, P < .00001, I = 90%) for median MNCV, (MD 5.68, 95% CI 3.53-7.83, P < .00001, I = 94%) for median SNCV, (MD 5.36, 95% CI 3.86-6.87, P < .00001, I = 92%) for peroneal MNCV, (MD 4.62, 95% CI 3.48-5.75, P < .00001, I = 86%) for peroneal SNCV. There were no serious adverse events associated with drug intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

M + P combination therapy was superior to P monotherapy for improvement of neuropathic symptoms and NCVs in DPN patients. Moreover, no serious adverse events occur in combination therapy.

摘要

背景

在许多临床试验报告中,已提出使用前列腺素E1(P)或甲钴胺(M)治疗糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)。然而,两种药物的联合疗效仍不明确。

目的

本报告旨在评估M加P(M+P)治疗DPN的疗效,并与P单药治疗进行比较,为合理用药提供参考依据。

方法

检索截至2017年9月发表的关于M+P治疗DPN的随机对照试验(RCT)。计算风险比(RR)、平均差(MD)和95%置信区间(CI),并采用I²检验评估异质性。还进行了亚组分析和敏感性分析。测量的结果如下:临床疗效、正中运动神经传导速度(MNCV)、正中感觉神经传导速度(SNCV)、腓总神经MNCV、腓总神经SNCV和不良反应。

结果

纳入16项RCT,共1136名参与者。M+P联合治疗的临床疗效显著优于P单药治疗(15项试验;RR 1.25,95%CI 1.18-1.32,P<0.00001,I²=27%)。与P单药治疗相比,M+P联合治疗对神经传导速度的合并效应为:正中MNCV(MD 6.29,95%CI 4.63-7.94,P<0.00001,I²=90%),正中SNCV(MD 5.68,95%CI 3.53-7.83,P<0.00001,I²=94%),腓总神经MNCV(MD 5.36,95%CI 3.86-6.87,P<0.00001,I²=92%),腓总神经SNCV(MD 4.62,95%CI 3.48-5.75,P<0.00001,I²=86%)。药物干预未出现严重不良事件。

结论

M+P联合治疗在改善DPN患者神经病变症状和神经传导速度方面优于P单药治疗。此外,联合治疗未出现严重不良事件。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验