Suppr超能文献

当代听诊器清洁实践:150 年来我们尚未了解的内容。

Contemporary stethoscope cleaning practices: What we haven't learned in 150 years.

机构信息

School of Health Professions, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

University of South Alabama College of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Mobile, AL.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2019 Mar;47(3):238-242. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stethoscopes can be microorganism reservoirs. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has published medical equipment disinfection guidelines to minimize infection transmission risk, but studies of guideline adherence have been predominately survey based, with little direct observation of disinfection practices.

METHODS

We performed an observational, cross-sectional, anonymous study of patient-provider interactions, assessing practitioners' frequency and methods of stethoscope and hand disinfection practices.

RESULTS

Stethoscopes were disinfected in 18% of 400 observed interactions, with less than 4% verified as conforming to CDC guidelines. None was disinfected before patient examinations involving open chest or abdominal wounds, as recommended by the CDC. Hands were cleaned before and after encounters 27 times (6.8%) but were not cleaned at all in 231 (58%) encounters, although gloves were worn in 197 (85.3%) of these cases.

DISCUSSION

Stethoscope disinfection is grossly overlooked, possibly jeopardizing patient safety, particularly in acute care interactions. Periodic stethoscope disinfection, although inconvenient, helps reduce bacterial contamination and may reduce health care-associated infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Stethoscopes were disinfected per CDC guidelines in less than 4% of encounters and were not disinfected at all in 82% of encounters. Although hands were rarely cleaned (6.8%) per CDC guidelines, gloves were usually worn, but no convenient stethoscope equivalent exists. Stethoscope cleanliness must be addressed.

摘要

背景

听诊器可能是微生物的储存库。美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)已经发布了医疗设备消毒指南,以最大限度地降低感染传播的风险,但对指南遵循情况的研究主要是基于调查,很少直接观察消毒实践。

方法

我们对医患互动进行了一项观察性、横断面、匿名研究,评估从业者听诊器和手部消毒的频率和方法。

结果

在观察到的 400 次互动中,有 18%的听诊器进行了消毒,只有不到 4%的消毒符合 CDC 指南。没有一次在进行涉及开胸或腹部伤口的检查前进行消毒,这是 CDC 建议的。在 27 次(6.8%)接触中,在接触前后清洁了手,但在 231 次(58%)接触中根本没有清洁,尽管在 197 次(85.3%)这些情况下都戴了手套。

讨论

听诊器的消毒被严重忽视,这可能危及患者的安全,尤其是在急性护理互动中。定期对听诊器进行消毒,虽然不方便,但有助于减少细菌污染,并可能减少与医疗保健相关的感染。

结论

根据 CDC 指南,在不到 4%的接触中对听诊器进行了消毒,而在 82%的接触中根本没有进行消毒。虽然按照 CDC 指南,很少对手进行清洁(6.8%),但通常会戴手套,但没有方便的听诊器替代品。必须解决听诊器的清洁问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验