Suppr超能文献

迈向主动采样和好奇心的神经科学。

Towards a neuroscience of active sampling and curiosity.

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

Kavli Institute for Brain Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018 Dec;19(12):758-770. doi: 10.1038/s41583-018-0078-0.

Abstract

In natural behaviour, animals actively interrogate their environments using endogenously generated 'question-and-answer' strategies. However, in laboratory settings participants typically engage with externally imposed stimuli and tasks, and the mechanisms of active sampling remain poorly understood. We review a nascent neuroscientific literature that examines active-sampling policies and their relation to attention and curiosity. We distinguish between information sampling, in which organisms reduce uncertainty relevant to a familiar task, and information search, in which they investigate in an open-ended fashion to discover new tasks. We review evidence that both sampling and search depend on individual preferences over cognitive states, including attitudes towards uncertainty, learning progress and types of information. We propose that, although these preferences are non-instrumental and can on occasion interfere with external goals, they are important heuristics that allow organisms to cope with the high complexity of both sampling and search, and generate curiosity-driven investigations in large, open environments in which rewards are sparse and ex ante unknown.

摘要

在自然行为中,动物会主动利用内源性的“问答”策略来探索环境。然而,在实验室环境中,参与者通常会接触到外部强加的刺激和任务,主动采样的机制仍未被充分理解。我们回顾了一个新兴的神经科学文献,该文献探讨了主动采样策略及其与注意力和好奇心的关系。我们区分了信息采样,即生物体减少与熟悉任务相关的不确定性,以及信息搜索,即它们以开放式的方式进行调查以发现新任务。我们回顾了证据表明,采样和搜索都取决于个体对认知状态的偏好,包括对不确定性、学习进展和信息类型的态度。我们提出,尽管这些偏好是非工具性的,有时会干扰外部目标,但它们是重要的启发式方法,使生物体能够应对采样和搜索的高复杂性,并在奖励稀疏且事先未知的大型开放环境中产生好奇心驱动的调查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验