Suppr超能文献

评估偏好转变及其对患者知识和决策冲突的影响:一项关于交互式前列腺特异性抗原检测患者决策辅助工具的横断面研究

Assessing Preference Shift and Effects on Patient Knowledge and Decisional Conflict: Cross-Sectional Study of an Interactive Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Patient Decision Aid.

作者信息

Scalia Peter, Elwyn Glyn, Kremer Jan, Faber Marjan, Durand Marie-Anne

机构信息

The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2018 Nov 21;4(2):e11102. doi: 10.2196/11102.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials of Web-based decision aids for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing indicate that these interventions improve knowledge and reduce decisional conflict. However, we do not know about these tools' impact on people who spontaneously use a PSA testing patient decision aid on the internet.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the impact of the Web-based PSA Option Grid patient decision aid on preference shift, knowledge, and decisional conflict; (2) identify which frequently asked questions (FAQs) are associated with preference shift; and (3) explore the possible relationships between these outcomes.

METHODS

Data were collected between January 1, 2016, and December 30, 2017. Users who accessed the Web-based, interactive PSA Option Grid were provided with 3 options: have a PSA test, no PSA test, or unsure. Users first declared their initial preference and then completed 5 knowledge questions and a 4-item (yes or no) validated decisional conflict scale (Sure of myself, Understand information, Risk-benefit ratio, Encouragement; SURE). Next, users were presented with 10 FAQs and asked to identify their preference for each question based on the information provided. At the end, users declared their final preference and completed the same knowledge and decisional conflict questions. Paired sample t tests were employed to compare before and after knowledge and decisional conflict scores. A multinomial regression analysis was performed to determine which FAQs were associated with a shift in screening preference.

RESULTS

Of all the people who accessed the PSA Option Grid, 39.8% (186/467) completed the interactive journey and associated surveys. After excluding 22 female users, we analyzed 164 responses. At completion, users shifted their preference to "not having the PSA test" (43/164, 26.2%, vs 117/164, 71.3%; P<.001), had higher levels of knowledge (112/164, 68.3%, vs 146/164, 89.0%; P<.001), and lower decisional conflict (94/164, 57.3%, vs 18/164, 11.0%; P<.001). There were 3 FAQs associated with preference shift: "What does the test involve?" "If my PSA level is high, what are the chances that I have prostate cancer?" and "What are the risks?" We did not find any relationship between knowledge, decisional conflict, and preference shift.

CONCLUSIONS

Unprompted use of the interactive PSA Option Grid leads to preference shift, increased knowledge, and reduced decisional conflict, which confirms the ability of these tools to influence decision making, even when used outside clinical encounters.

摘要

背景

针对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测的基于网络的决策辅助工具的随机试验表明,这些干预措施可提高知识水平并减少决策冲突。然而,我们并不清楚这些工具对那些在互联网上自发使用PSA检测患者决策辅助工具的人有何影响。

目的

本研究的目的是:(1)确定基于网络的PSA选项网格患者决策辅助工具对偏好转变、知识水平和决策冲突的影响;(2)确定哪些常见问题(FAQ)与偏好转变相关;(3)探讨这些结果之间可能存在的关系。

方法

在2016年1月1日至2017年12月30日期间收集数据。访问基于网络的交互式PSA选项网格的用户有3个选项:进行PSA检测、不进行PSA检测或不确定。用户首先声明他们的初始偏好,然后完成5个知识问题和一个经过验证的4项(是或否)决策冲突量表(自信、理解信息、风险效益比、鼓励;SURE)。接下来,向用户展示10个常见问题,并要求他们根据提供的信息确定对每个问题的偏好。最后,用户声明他们的最终偏好,并完成相同的知识和决策冲突问题。采用配对样本t检验比较前后的知识和决策冲突得分。进行多项回归分析以确定哪些常见问题与筛查偏好的转变相关。

结果

在所有访问PSA选项网格的人中,39.8%(186/467)完成了交互式流程及相关调查。排除22名女性用户后,我们分析了164份回复。完成时,用户将偏好转向“不进行PSA检测”(43/164,26.2%,对比117/164,71.3%;P<.001),知识水平更高(112/164,68.3%,对比146/164,89.0%;P<.001),决策冲突更低(94/164,57.3%,对比18/164,11.0%;P<.001)。有3个常见问题与偏好转变相关:“检测包括哪些内容?”“如果我的PSA水平高,我患前列腺癌的几率是多少?”以及“有哪些风险?”我们未发现知识、决策冲突和偏好转变之间存在任何关系。

结论

自发使用交互式PSA选项网格会导致偏好转变、知识增加和决策冲突减少,这证实了这些工具即使在临床接触之外使用时也有影响决策的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d67a/6282011/ae683c5cc529/cancer_v4i2e11102_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验