Turning Point, Registered Charity, Standon House, 21 Mansell Street, London, E1 8AA, UK.
Psychiatr Q. 2019 Mar;90(1):197-215. doi: 10.1007/s11126-018-9620-5.
Digital interventions for anxiety disorders have been well-researched over the past two decades. However, reviews to date have focused on internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT), whereas other psychological interventions have received less attention. The aim of this review was therefore to evaluate the effectiveness of digitally delivered psychological therapies (CBT, Attention Bias Modification, Exposure Therapy, Applied Relaxation, Bibliotherapy, Psychodynamic Therapy, Mindfulness, Behavioural Stress Management, Counselling) compared with control conditions and/or other psychological interventions for anxiety disorders (Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), Health Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Specific Phobias, Panic Disorder (PD), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD)]. 68 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed. SAD was the anxiety disorder for which the most RCTs were conducted. Overall, findings support the effectiveness of iCBT for SAD; for the remaining interventions, although some RCTs indicated significant improvement (within groups) at post-treatment and/or follow up, between group findings were less consistent and overall, methodological differences across trials failed to provide strong supporting evidence. Finally, the level of therapist contact or expertise did not appear to affect much treatment effectiveness. Additional large, methodologically rigorous trials are needed to investigate further whether different digitally delivered psychological interventions are equally effective for anxiety disorders. Moreover, further studies are pertinent in order to examine the maintenance of therapy gains after the end of treatments and understand how these work [(e.g. the influence of therapist factors, user engagement and/or satisfaction, potential access barriers and treatments with diverse population groups (e.g. BME groups)].
在过去的二十年中,针对焦虑症的数字干预措施已经得到了充分的研究。然而,迄今为止的综述重点关注基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT),而其他心理干预措施则受到较少关注。因此,本综述的目的是评估数字交付的心理疗法(CBT、注意偏差修正、暴露疗法、应用放松、阅读疗法、心理动力学疗法、正念、行为应激管理、咨询)与对照条件和/或其他心理干预措施(社交焦虑障碍(SAD)、健康焦虑、强迫症(OCD)、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、特定恐惧症、惊恐障碍(PD)、广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD))治疗焦虑症的有效性。共回顾了 68 项随机对照试验(RCT)。SAD 是进行 RCT 最多的焦虑症。总体而言,研究结果支持 iCBT 治疗 SAD 的有效性;对于其余干预措施,尽管一些 RCT 表明治疗后(组内)和/或随访时存在显著改善,但组间发现结果不一致,总体而言,试验之间的方法学差异未能提供强有力的支持证据。最后,治疗师的接触或专业水平似乎并没有对治疗效果产生太大影响。需要进行更多大型、方法严谨的试验,以进一步研究不同的数字交付心理干预措施对焦虑症是否同样有效。此外,进一步的研究对于检查治疗结束后的治疗效果的维持以及了解这些干预措施如何发挥作用(例如治疗师因素、用户参与度和/或满意度、潜在的获取障碍以及针对不同人群的治疗(例如 BME 群体))是相关的。