Respiratory Research Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 66, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
Respiratory Research Unit, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 66, 2400, Copenhagen, NV, Denmark.
Respir Med. 2018 Dec;145:41-47. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.020. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
Guidelines recommend a differentiation of difficult-to-treat asthma from severe asthma. However, this might be complex and to which extent this distinction is achievable in clinical practice remains unknown.
To evaluate to which degree a systematic evaluation protocol enables a differentiation between severe versus difficult-to-treat asthma in patients in specialist care on high intensity asthma treatment, i.e. potentially severe asthma.
All adult asthma patients seen in four respiratory clinics over one year were screened prospectively for asthma severity. Patients with difficult-to-control asthma according to ERS/ATS criteria (high-dose inhaled corticosteroids/oral corticosteroids) underwent systematic assessment to differentiate severe asthma patients from those with other causes of poor asthma control: objective confirmation of the asthma diagnosis as well as assessment of treatment barriers and comorbidities.
Overall, 1034 asthma patients were screened, of whom 175 (16.9%) had difficult-to-control asthma. 117 of these accepted inclusion, and completed systematic assessment. Asthma diagnosis was objectively confirmed in 88%. Sub-optimal adherence (42.5%), inhaler errors (31.5%) and unmanaged comorbidities (66.7%) were common. After primary assessment, 12% (14/117) fulfilled strict criteria for severe asthma. Moreover, 56% (66/117) were instantly classified as difficult-to-treat asthma due to poor adherence/inhaler technique. Finally, an ´overlap' group of 32% (37/117) were identified with patients being adherent and displaying correct inhaler technique, but had unmanaged comorbidities -potentially fitting into both the difficult-to-treat and severe group.
Only a minority of patients with difficult-to-control asthma were found to have severe asthma after primary systematic assessment. Nevertheless, strict categorisation of severe vs. difficult-to-treat asthma seems to pose a challenge.
指南建议将难治性哮喘与重度哮喘区分开来。然而,这可能很复杂,在临床实践中,这种区分的程度尚不清楚。
评估系统评估方案在高剂量吸入皮质激素/口服皮质激素治疗的专科护理中,对潜在重度哮喘患者中,能否将严重哮喘与难治性哮喘区分开来。
对一年内在四个呼吸科诊所就诊的所有成年哮喘患者进行前瞻性筛查,评估哮喘严重程度。根据 ERS/ATS 标准(高剂量吸入皮质激素/口服皮质激素)控制不佳的哮喘患者接受系统评估,以区分严重哮喘患者和其他原因导致的哮喘控制不佳的患者:客观确认哮喘诊断以及评估治疗障碍和合并症。
总共筛查了 1034 名哮喘患者,其中 175 名(16.9%)有难治性哮喘。其中 117 名患者接受了纳入并完成了系统评估。88%的患者客观确认了哮喘诊断。普遍存在治疗不依从(42.5%)、吸入器错误(31.5%)和未控制的合并症(66.7%)。初步评估后,12%(14/117)满足严格的重度哮喘标准。此外,56%(66/117)由于治疗不依从/吸入器技术差而立即被归类为难治性哮喘。最后,32%(37/117)的患者被归入“重叠”组,他们的治疗依从性好,且使用正确的吸入器技术,但有未控制的合并症-可能同时符合难治性和重度哮喘。
在经过初步系统评估后,只有少数难治性哮喘患者被发现患有重度哮喘。然而,严格分类严重哮喘与难治性哮喘似乎具有挑战性。