Suppr超能文献

加拿大成年人自报体力活动与加速度计测量体力活动的比较。

Comparison of self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity in Canadian adults.

机构信息

Health Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

Centre for Surveillance and Applied Research, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.

出版信息

Health Rep. 2018 Dec 19;29(12):3-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity levels generally exhibit low correlation and agreement. The objective of this study is to compare estimates of physical activity among adults from a newly developed Canadian questionnaire with those obtained objectively by accelerometry.

DATA AND METHODS

Data for 18- to 79-year-olds (N = 2,372) were collected in 2014 and 2015 as part of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS). Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was reported on the household questionnaire by domain (transportation, recreation, and occupational or household) as part of the new Physical Activity Adult Questionnaire (PAAQ) and measured objectively using the Actical accelerometer. Correlation and mean difference analyses were used to assess the relationships between measured and reported physical activity variables. Linear regression was used to test the association between measured and reported physical activity and measures of obesity.

RESULTS

On average, Canadian adults reported more physical activity than they accumulated on an accelerometer (49 minutes versus 23 minutes per day). The highest correlation observed was between accelerometer-measured MVPA and the sum of self-reported recreation and transportation activity (R = 0.36, p ⟨ 0.0001). The sum of activity from all domains (recreation + transportation + occupational or household) exhibited a lower correlation with measured variables because the occupational or household domain was negatively correlated with MVPA (R = -0.04). The occupational or household domain was positively correlated with light-intensity physical activity (R = 0.20, p ⟨ 0.0001). Respondents in the least active quintile were more likely than those in the most active quintile to report more activity than was measured by the accelerometer. On average, the most active quintile reported less activity than was measured by the accelerometer.

DISCUSSION

The newly developed Canadian physical activity questionnaire exhibited modest correlation and agreement with accelerometer-measured physical activity among adults. Accelerometers and questionnaires provide complementary information, about different aspects of physical activity (actual movement versus perceived time). Consequently, one should exercise caution in using estimates derived from these methods interchangeably.

摘要

背景

自我报告和加速度计测量的身体活动水平通常表现出低相关性和一致性。本研究的目的是比较新开发的加拿大问卷和加速度计客观测量的成年人身体活动估计值。

数据和方法

2014 年至 2015 年,作为加拿大健康测量调查(CHMS)的一部分,收集了 18 至 79 岁人群的数据(n=2372)。新的身体活动成人问卷(PAAQ)通过领域(交通、娱乐和职业或家庭)报告家庭问卷中的中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA),并使用 Actical 加速度计进行客观测量。使用相关和平均差异分析评估测量和报告的身体活动变量之间的关系。线性回归用于检验测量和报告的身体活动与肥胖测量值之间的关联。

结果

平均而言,加拿大成年人报告的身体活动量多于他们在加速度计上积累的活动量(49 分钟对每天 23 分钟)。观察到的最高相关性是在加速度计测量的 MVPA 与自我报告的娱乐和交通活动总和之间(R=0.36,p ⟨ 0.0001)。所有领域(娱乐+交通+职业或家庭)的活动总和与测量变量的相关性较低,因为职业或家庭领域与 MVPA 呈负相关(R=-0.04)。职业或家庭领域与低强度身体活动呈正相关(R=0.20,p ⟨ 0.0001)。最不活跃五分位数的受访者比最活跃五分位数的受访者更有可能报告比加速度计测量的更多的活动。平均而言,最活跃的五分位数报告的活动比加速度计测量的少。

讨论

新开发的加拿大身体活动问卷在成年人中与加速度计测量的身体活动表现出适度的相关性和一致性。加速度计和问卷提供了关于身体活动不同方面的互补信息(实际运动与感知时间)。因此,在相互替代使用这些方法得出的估计值时应谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验