Suppr超能文献

过氧乙酸消毒后浮游菌和生物膜菌的再生长抑制。

Inhibition of regrowth of planktonic and biofilm bacteria after peracetic acid disinfection.

机构信息

Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States.

Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, United States.

出版信息

Water Res. 2019 Feb 1;149:640-649. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.062. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

Abstract

Peracetic acid (PAA) is a promising alternative to chlorine for disinfection; however, bacterial regrowth after PAA disinfection is poorly understood. This study compared the regrowth of bacteria (Gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Gram-positive Bacillus sp.) after disinfection with PAA or free chlorine. In the absence of organic matter, PAA and free chlorine prevented the regrowth of planktonic cells of P. aeruginosa PAO1 at C·t (= disinfectant concentration × contact time) doses of (28.5 ± 9.8) mg PAA·min·L and (22.5 ± 10.6) mg Cl·min·L, respectively, suggesting that they had comparable efficiencies in preventing the regrowth of planktonic bacteria. For comparison, the minimum C·t doses of PAA and free chlorine to prevent the regrowth of P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm cells in the absence of organic matter were (14,000 ± 1,732) mg PAA·min·L and (6,500 ± 2,291) mg Cl·min·L, respectively. PAA was less effective than free chlorine in killing bacteria within biofilms in the absence of organic matter most likely because PAA reacts with biofilm matrix constituents slower than free chlorine. In the presence of organic matter, although the bactericidal efficiencies of both disinfectants significantly decreased, PAA was less affected due to its slower reaction with organic matter and/or slower self-decomposition. For instance, in a dilute Lysogeny broth-Miller, the minimum concentrations of PAA and free chlorine to prevent the regrowth of planktonic P. aeruginosa PAO1 were 20 mg PAA·L and 300 mg Cl·L, respectively. While both disinfectants are strong oxidants disrupting cell membrane, environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) revealed that PAA made holes in the center of the cells, whereas free chlorine desiccated the cells. Overall, this study shows that PAA is a powerful disinfectant to prevent bacterial regrowth even in the presence of organic matter.

摘要

过氧乙酸(PAA)是一种有前途的替代氯的消毒剂;然而,PAA 消毒后细菌的再生情况了解甚少。本研究比较了过氧乙酸和游离氯消毒后细菌(革兰氏阴性铜绿假单胞菌 PAO1 和革兰氏阳性芽孢杆菌)的再生情况。在没有有机物的情况下,PAA 和游离氯分别以(28.5±9.8)mg PAA·min·L 和(22.5±10.6)mg Cl·min·L 的 C·t(=消毒剂浓度×接触时间)剂量阻止了浮游细胞的再生铜绿假单胞菌 PAO1,表明它们在阻止浮游细菌再生方面效率相当。相比之下,在没有有机物的情况下,PAA 和游离氯阻止铜绿假单胞菌 PAO1 生物膜细胞再生的最小 C·t 剂量分别为(14,000±1,732)mg PAA·min·L 和(6,500±2,291)mg Cl·min·L。在没有有机物的情况下,过氧乙酸在杀死生物膜内细菌方面不如游离氯有效,这很可能是因为过氧乙酸与生物膜基质成分的反应速度比游离氯慢。在有有机物的情况下,尽管两种消毒剂的杀菌效率都显著降低,但由于过氧乙酸与有机物的反应速度较慢和/或自分解速度较慢,受影响较小。例如,在稀的溶菌肉汤-Miller 中,阻止浮游铜绿假单胞菌 PAO1 再生的最小 PAA 和游离氯浓度分别为 20mg PAA·L 和 300mg Cl·L。虽然两种消毒剂都是破坏细胞膜的强氧化剂,但环境扫描电子显微镜(ESEM)显示,过氧乙酸在细胞中心打了孔,而游离氯使细胞干燥。总的来说,本研究表明,即使在有机物存在的情况下,过氧乙酸也是一种有效的消毒剂,可以防止细菌再生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验