Suppr超能文献

布洛芬、塞来昔布和曲马多在第三磨牙手术后的镇痛效果比较:一项随机双盲对照试验

Comparative Analgesic Effects of Ibuprofen, Celecoxib and Tramadol after third Molar Surgery: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Akinbade Akinwale O, Ndukwe Kizito C, Owotade Foluso J

机构信息

Department of Dental and Maxillofacial Surgery, Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria, Phone: +234 803423 6766, e-mail:

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,Faculty of Dentistry Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

出版信息

J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):1334-1340.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study compared the effects of ibuprofen, celecoxib and tramadol on pain after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This double blind randomized controlled trial recruited 135 healthy subjects who required surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars, with a mean age of 26.51 ± SD 6.29 years. The subjects were randomized into three equal groups and given appropriate doses of each drug immediately after extraction. They continued the drugs up to 48 hours after extraction. Postoperative pain intensity was self-recorded by subjects at 4, 8, 16, 24 and 48 hours after extraction, using visual analogue scale (VAS). Data analysis involved descriptive statistics, 2-sample Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal Wallis rank test. Statistical analysis was done using intention-to-treat analysis. The mean VAS at each point of postoperative pain assessment was compared using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) among the three groups. Statistical significance was inferred at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean VAS score of the celecoxib group (32.35± SD 23.96) at 4 hours was the lowest among the three groups. This was followed by the ibuprofen group with mean VAS score of 38.96 ± SD 22.30. Whereas, the subjects in tramadol group experienced the highest VAS score (53.31 ± SD 23.30) at 4 hours. There was statistically significant difference in the mean VAS scores at 4 hours after extraction when the three groups were compared (p = 0.0039). Celecoxib group also had the lowest mean VAS scores at 8 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours after the extraction. None of the subjects in the ibuprofen and celecoxib groups reported any adverse effect of the analgesics, whereas 47.61% of the tramadol group did.

CONCLUSION

Celecoxib was the most effective analgesic of the three studied drugs in controlling postoperative pain after mandibular third molar extraction in our subjects. It was closely followed by ibuprofen while tramadol was found to be the least effective.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The outcomes of this study suggest that celecoxib can be prescribed for effective control of postoperative pain after third molar surgery especially in patients with peptic ulcer disease who will not tolerate the adverse effect of traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. It also shows that ibuprofen can be an analgesic of choice for patients who are not at risk of gastrointestinal complications of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Tramadol could be considered for patients with milder postoperative pain after third molar surgery.

摘要

背景

本研究比较了布洛芬、塞来昔布和曲马多对下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛的影响。

患者与方法

这项双盲随机对照试验招募了135名需要手术拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的健康受试者,平均年龄为26.51±标准差6.29岁。受试者被随机分为三组,拔牙后立即给予每种药物适当剂量。他们在拔牙后持续用药48小时。术后疼痛强度由受试者在拔牙后4、8、16、24和48小时使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)自行记录。数据分析包括描述性统计、两样本Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal Wallis秩和检验。采用意向性分析进行统计分析。使用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)比较三组术后疼痛评估各时间点的平均VAS。当p<0.05时推断具有统计学意义。

结果

塞来昔布组在4小时时的平均VAS评分(32.35±标准差23.96)在三组中最低。其次是布洛芬组,平均VAS评分为38.96±标准差22.30。而曲马多组受试者在4小时时的VAS评分最高(53.31±标准差23.30)。比较三组拔牙后4小时的平均VAS评分有统计学显著差异(p = 0.0039)。塞来昔布组在拔牙后8小时、24小时和48小时的平均VAS评分也最低。布洛芬组和塞来昔布组的受试者均未报告镇痛药的任何不良反应,而曲马多组有47.61%的受试者报告了不良反应。

结论

在我们的受试者中,塞来昔布是三种研究药物中控制下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛最有效的镇痛药。其次是布洛芬,而曲马多被发现效果最差。

临床意义

本研究结果表明,塞来昔布可用于有效控制第三磨牙手术后的术后疼痛,特别是对于不能耐受传统非甾体抗炎药不良反应的消化性溃疡病患者。它还表明,布洛芬可以作为无非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)胃肠道并发症风险患者的镇痛选择。对于第三磨牙手术后疼痛较轻的患者,可以考虑使用曲马多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验