Institute for Cellular Medicine - Diabetes, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK.
Diabetologia. 2019 Mar;62(3):357-369. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4801-1. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
Three further cardiovascular (CV) outcome studies of glucose-lowering drugs (linagliptin, albiglutide and dapagliflozin) have recently been published, adding to the twelve earlier within-class studies. The linagliptin study (CARMELINA) recruited people with renal disease as well as prior CV events and confirms the overall CV safety (and other safety) of the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, with no heart failure risk associated with this agent. However, taken together with the findings from two previous studies of DPP4 inhibitors (sitagliptin and saxagliptin), the three DPP4 inhibitor CV outcome trials (CVOTs) have highlighted a safety signal regarding risk of pancreatitis. Like CARMELINA, the albiglutide study (Harmony Outcome) had a very high CV event rate. Despite being a short duration study, albiglutide showed strong superiority for reduction in the major adverse CV events (MACE) composite in people with extant cardiovascular disease (CVD), in line with the earlier studies on the GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) liraglutide and semaglutide. Positive effects can be detected for all these medications from before 12 months and continue for the whole study duration. No new safety issues for albiglutide are identified and the lack of a pancreatitis or a pancreatic cancer signal for this class is now clear. For the sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor class, the DECLARE-TIMI 58 study (of dapagliflozin) clearly indicates strong protection for heart failure in those with CVD, and probably in those with no prior CVD. There is also strong protection against renal decline with dapagliflozin, with similar risk estimates in DECLARE as previously reported for empagliflozin and canagliflozin. However, findings for MACE outcomes with dapagliflozin are not concordant with the empagliflozin and canagliflozin studies, and are not convincingly superior across class and for the longer term. Care is required when prescribing the SGLT2 inhibitor class of medications to people with foot vascular issues or prior amputation, and to insulin users in regard of ketoacidosis. In summary, taking into account the findings from these new studies, it is suggested that a GLP-1RA should be offered to all people with CVD and type 2 diabetes, and SGLT2 inhibitors should be prescribed for those at high risk of heart failure or with progressive decline in eGFR. DPP4 inhibitors are a safe choice within the glucose-lowering stepped algorithm.
三项新的降糖药物(利格列汀、阿必鲁肽和达格列净)心血管结局研究近期发表,加上之前 12 项同类研究,共涵盖 15 项研究。利格列汀的 CArMELINA 研究纳入了合并肾脏疾病和心血管疾病既往史的患者,证实了二肽基肽酶-4(DPP4)抑制剂总体上具有心血管安全性(和其他安全性),且该药物与心力衰竭风险无关。然而,与两项先前的 DPP4 抑制剂(西格列汀和沙格列汀)研究结果结合,这三项 DPP4 抑制剂心血管结局试验(CVOT)凸显了与胰腺炎风险相关的安全性信号。与 CArMELINA 研究一样,阿必鲁肽的 Harmony Outcomes 研究也具有很高的心血管事件发生率。尽管研究时间较短,阿必鲁肽仍显示出在既往有心血管疾病(CVD)的患者中,降低主要不良心血管事件(MACE)复合终点的显著优势,与先前关于胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)利拉鲁肽和司美格鲁肽的研究一致。这些药物在 12 个月前就可以检测到积极的效果,并且持续整个研究期间。阿必鲁肽没有新的安全性问题,该类药物也没有出现胰腺炎或胰腺癌信号。对于钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2(SGLT2)抑制剂类,DECLARE-TIMI 58 研究(达格列净)明确表明在 CVD 患者中具有很强的心力衰竭保护作用,在无 CVD 患者中可能也有这种作用。达格列净也能强烈保护肾脏免受损害,DECLARE 研究的风险估计与之前报道的恩格列净和卡格列净相似。然而,达格列净的 MACE 结局研究结果与恩格列净和卡格列净的研究不一致,且在整个研究期间和同类药物相比没有明显优势。对于有足部血管问题或既往截肢的患者,以及对于使用胰岛素的患者,在处方 SGLT2 抑制剂类药物时需要谨慎,因为这些患者可能会发生酮症酸中毒。总之,考虑到这些新研究的结果,建议所有合并 CVD 和 2 型糖尿病的患者应使用 GLP-1RA,对于心力衰竭高危患者或 eGFR 进行性下降的患者,应处方 SGLT2 抑制剂。DPP4 抑制剂是降糖阶梯算法中的安全选择。