Cancer Prevention and Control Program.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health.
Adv Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;10(2):185-195. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmy071.
The literature on the role of inflammation in health has grown exponentially over the past several decades. Paralleling this growth has been an equally intense focus on the role of diet in modulating inflammation, with a doubling in the size of the literature approximately every 4 y. The Dietary Inflammatory Index (DII) was developed to provide a quantitative means for assessing the role of diet in relation to health outcomes ranging from blood concentrations of inflammatory cytokines to chronic diseases. Based on literature from a variety of different study designs ranging from cell culture to observational and experimental studies in humans, the DII was designed to be universally applicable across all human studies with adequate dietary assessment. Over the past 4 y, the DII has been used in >200 studies and forms the basis for 12 meta-analyses. In the process of conducting this work, lessons were learned with regard to methodologic issues related to total energy and nutrient intake and energy and nutrient densities. Accordingly, refinements to the original algorithm have been made. In this article we discuss these improvements and observations that we made with regard to misuse and misinterpretation of the DII and provide suggestions for future developments.
过去几十年,关于炎症在健康中的作用的文献呈指数级增长。与之并行的是,人们对饮食在调节炎症方面的作用同样给予了强烈关注,相关文献的规模大约每 4 年翻一番。膳食炎症指数(DII)的开发提供了一种定量方法,用于评估饮食与从炎症细胞因子的血液浓度到慢性疾病等健康结果之间的关系。基于来自各种不同研究设计的文献,包括细胞培养、观察性和人体实验研究,DII 旨在适用于所有具有充足饮食评估的人类研究。在过去的 4 年中,DII 已在超过 200 项研究中使用,并构成 12 项荟萃分析的基础。在进行这项工作的过程中,我们了解到与总能量和营养素摄入以及能量和营养素密度相关的方法学问题。因此,对原始算法进行了改进。在本文中,我们讨论了这些改进以及我们在 DII 的误用和误解方面的观察结果,并为未来的发展提供了建议。