Suppr超能文献

团队培训干预对不良围产儿和产妇结局的影响:一项 stepped wedge 研究。

Effect of a cluster randomised team training intervention on adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes: a stepped wedge study.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BJOG. 2019 Jun;126(7):907-914. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15611. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of an intervention based on Crew Resource Management team training, including a tool for structured communication, on adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes.

DESIGN

Stepped wedge.

SETTING

The Netherlands.

POPULATION OR SAMPLE

Registry data of 8123 women referred from primary care to a hospital during childbirth, at ≥ 32.0 weeks of singleton gestation and with no congenital abnormalities, in the period 2012-15.

METHODS

Obstetric teams of five hospitals and their surrounding primary-care midwifery practices participated in the intervention. In total, 49 team training sessions were organised for 465 care professionals (75.5% participated). Adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes before, during and after the intervention were analysed using multivariate logistic regression analyses.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Adverse Outcome Index (AOI-5), a composite measure involving; intrapartum or neonatal death, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, Apgar < 7 at 5 minutes, postpartum haemorrhage and/or perineal tear.

RESULTS

In total, an AOI-5 score was reported in 11.3% of the study population. No significant difference was found in the incidence of the AOI-5 score after the intervention compared with before the intervention (OR 1.07: 95% CI 0.92-1.24).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no effect of the intervention on adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes for women who were referred during childbirth. Team training is appreciated in practice, but evidence on the long-term impact is still limited. Upcoming studies should build on previous research and consider more sensitive outcome measures.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

A cluster randomised team training intervention showed no effect on adverse perinatal and maternal outcomes for women referred during childbirth.

摘要

目的

研究基于机组资源管理团队培训的干预措施(包括结构化沟通工具)对不良围产期和产妇结局的影响。

设计

阶梯式楔形设计。

设置

荷兰。

人群或样本

2012-2015 年期间,在荷兰一家医院分娩的 8123 名 32 周以上单胎妊娠且无先天异常的初诊孕妇的登记数据。

方法

五家医院的产科团队及其周围的初级保健助产实践参与了该干预措施。共组织了 49 次团队培训课程,共有 465 名医护人员参加(75.5%参加)。采用多变量逻辑回归分析方法分析干预前后不良围产期和产妇结局。

主要观察指标

不良结局指数(AOI-5),是一个包含产时或新生儿死亡、新生儿重症监护病房入院、5 分钟时 Apgar 评分<7、产后出血和/或会阴撕裂的复合指标。

结果

研究人群中,共有 11.3%报告了 AOI-5 评分。与干预前相比,干预后 AOI-5 评分的发生率没有显著差异(OR 1.07:95%CI 0.92-1.24)。

结论

我们发现,分娩期间转诊的女性不良围产期和产妇结局并未因干预而受到影响。团队培训在实践中得到了认可,但长期影响的证据仍然有限。未来的研究应在前人的研究基础上,考虑更敏感的结局指标。

推文摘要

一项针对团队的集群随机培训干预措施并未对分娩期间转诊的女性的不良围产和产妇结局产生影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0007/6594236/146c547d879c/BJO-126-907-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验