Suppr超能文献

2 型糖尿病与高血压。

Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension.

机构信息

From the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA (D.S., T.Z., Y.H., X.L., L.Q.).

Department of Public Health Laboratory Sciences, West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China (T.Z.).

出版信息

Circ Res. 2019 Mar 15;124(6):930-937. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314487.

Abstract

RATIONALE

In observational studies, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) has been associated with an increased risk of hypertension, and vice versa; however, the causality between these conditions remains to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

This population-based prospective cohort study sought to investigate the bidirectional causal relations of T2D with hypertension, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After exclusion of participants free of a history of heart failure, cardiovascular disease, cardiac procedures, and non-T2D diabetes mellitus, a total of 318 664 unrelated individuals with qualified genotyping data of European descent aged 37 to 73 from UK Biobank were included. The genetically instrumented T2D and hypertension were constructed using 134 and 233 single nucleotide polymorphisms, respectively. Seven complementary MR methods were applied, including inverse-variance weighted method, 2 median-based methods (simple and weighted), MR-Egger, MR-robust adjusted profile scores, MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier, and multivariate MR. The genetically instrumented T2D was associated with risk of hypertension (odds ratio, 1.07 [95% CI, 1.04-1.10], P=3.4×10), whereas the genetically determined hypertension showed no relationship with T2D (odds ratio, 0.96 [0.88-1.04], P=0.34). Our MR estimates from T2D to BP showed that the genetically instrumented T2D was associated with a 0.67 mm Hg higher systolic BP (95% CI, 0.41-0.93, P=5.75×10) but not with a higher diastolic BP. There was no clear evidence showing a causal effect of elevated systolic BP or diastolic BP on T2D risk. Positive pleiotropic bias was indicated in the hypertension→T2D relation (odds ratio, of MR-Egger intercept 1.010 [1.004-1.016], P=0.001) but not from T2D to hypertension (1.001 [0.998-1.004], P=0.556).

CONCLUSIONS

T2D may causally affect hypertension, whereas the relationship from hypertension to T2D is unlikely to be causal. These findings suggest the importance of keeping an optimal glycemic profile in general populations, and BP screening and monitoring, especially systolic BP, in patients with T2D.

摘要

背景

在观察性研究中,2 型糖尿病(T2D)与高血压的风险增加有关,反之亦然;然而,这些疾病之间的因果关系仍有待确定。

目的

本基于人群的前瞻性队列研究旨在使用孟德尔随机化(MR)分析探讨 T2D 与高血压、收缩压和舒张压(BP)之间的双向因果关系。

方法和结果

在排除了无心力衰竭、心血管疾病、心脏手术和非 T2D 糖尿病病史的参与者后,从英国生物库中纳入了 318664 名年龄在 37 至 73 岁之间、具有合格基因分型数据的欧洲血统的无关联个体。使用 134 个和 233 个单核苷酸多态性分别构建了遗传工具化的 T2D 和高血压。应用了 7 种互补的 MR 方法,包括逆方差加权法、2 种基于中位数的方法(简单和加权)、MR-Egger、MR-稳健调整的评分、MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier,以及多变量 MR。遗传工具化的 T2D 与高血压风险相关(比值比,1.07[95%CI,1.04-1.10],P=3.4×10),而遗传确定的高血压与 T2D 无关(比值比,0.96[0.88-1.04],P=0.34)。我们从 T2D 到 BP 的 MR 估计表明,遗传工具化的 T2D 与收缩压升高 0.67mmHg 相关(95%CI,0.41-0.93,P=5.75×10),但与舒张压升高无关。没有明确的证据表明升高的收缩压或舒张压与 T2D 风险之间存在因果关系。在高血压→T2D 关系中存在阳性的偏倚(MR-Egger 截距的比值比为 1.010[1.004-1.016],P=0.001),但从 T2D 到高血压的关系中没有(1.001[0.998-1.004],P=0.556)。

结论

T2D 可能会对高血压产生因果影响,而高血压对 T2D 的影响则不太可能是因果关系。这些发现表明,在一般人群中保持最佳血糖谱以及在 T2D 患者中进行血压筛查和监测(特别是收缩压)非常重要。

相似文献

1
Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension.
Circ Res. 2019 Mar 15;124(6):930-937. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.314487.
2
Type 2 Diabetes and Atrial Fibrillation: Evaluating Causal and Pleiotropic Pathways Using Mendelian Randomization.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e030298. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030298. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
4
Diabetes mellitus and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a Mendelian randomization study.
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Mar 20;24(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-02961-7.
5
White Blood Cells and Blood Pressure: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Circulation. 2020 Apr 21;141(16):1307-1317. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045102. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
[Genetic Causation Analysis of Hyperandrogenemia Testing Indicators and Preeclampsia].
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 May 20;55(3):566-573. doi: 10.12182/20240560106.
7
The effect of hypertension, obesity, and type 2 diabetes on lacunar stroke: A network Mendelian randomization study.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2025 Jun;35(6):103974. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2025.103974. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
8
Type 2 Diabetes, Metabolic Traits, and Risk of Heart Failure: A Mendelian Randomization Study.
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jul;44(7):1699-1705. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2518. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
9
Depression and type 2 diabetes risk: a Mendelian randomization study.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 29;15:1436411. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1436411. eCollection 2024.
10
Urinary Albumin, Sodium, and Potassium and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the UK Biobank: Observational and Mendelian Randomization Analyses.
Hypertension. 2020 Mar;75(3):714-722. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14028. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune Dysregulation Connecting Type 2 Diabetes and Cardiovascular Complications.
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;15(8):1241. doi: 10.3390/life15081241.
2
Vascular and Glycemic Modulation by , an Orchid Used as Traditional Medicine.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jun 12;18(6):881. doi: 10.3390/ph18060881.
4
Temporal analysis of non-communicable diseases and NCD-HIV/AIDS comorbidity in Malawi: A 4-year retrospective study 2020-2022.
Trop Med Int Health. 2025 Aug;30(8):782-800. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14134. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
5
Predicting incident type 2 diabetes in a Japanese cohort: an 8-year analysis of the NAGALA database.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 15;16:1465032. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1465032. eCollection 2025.
7
Time in target range for systolic blood pressure and stroke in people with and without diabetes: the Kailuan prospective cohort study.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 May 14;16:1537343. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1537343. eCollection 2025.
9
Excess prevalence of chronic diseases in elderly people with diabetes and non-diabetics in Poland.
PLoS One. 2025 May 22;20(5):e0319242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319242. eCollection 2025.
10
Crosstalk between hypertension and diabetes: focusing on pregnancy and offspring. A systematic review.
Front Physiol. 2025 Apr 25;16:1519410. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1519410. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies.
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Aug 1;27(R2):R195-R208. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy163.
3
From SNPs to pathways: Biological interpretation of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) genome wide association study (GWAS) results.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0193515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193515. eCollection 2018.
4
Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 May;6(5):361-369. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30051-2. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
5
Causal associations between risk factors and common diseases inferred from GWAS summary data.
Nat Commun. 2018 Jan 15;9(1):224. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02317-2.
6
Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus: Coprediction and Time Trajectories.
Hypertension. 2018 Mar;71(3):422-428. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10546. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
9
Diabetes and Hypertension: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.
Diabetes Care. 2017 Sep;40(9):1273-1284. doi: 10.2337/dci17-0026.
10
Mendelian randomization in cardiometabolic disease: challenges in evaluating causality.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Oct;14(10):577-590. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.78. Epub 2017 Jun 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验