Department of Psychology, University of Michigan.
School of Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Bothell.
Am Psychol. 2019 Jan;74(1):20-35. doi: 10.1037/amp0000338.
Beginning in the mid-1990s, the construct of historical trauma was introduced into the clinical and health science literatures to contextualize, describe, and explain disproportionately high rates of psychological distress and health disparities among Indigenous populations. As a conceptual precursor to racial trauma, Indigenous historical trauma (IHT) is distinguished by its emphasis on ancestral adversity that is intergenerationally transmitted in ways that compromise descendent well-being. In this systematic review of the health impacts of IHT, 32 empirical articles were identified that statistically analyzed the relationship between a measure of IHT and a health outcome for Indigenous samples from the United States and Canada. These articles were categorized based on their specific method for operationalizing IHT, yielding 19 articles that were grouped as historical loss studies, 11 articles that were grouped as residential school ancestry studies, and three articles that were grouped as "other" studies. Articles in all three categories included diverse respondents, disparate designs, varied statistical techniques, and a range of health outcomes. Most reported statistically significant associations between higher indicators of IHT and adverse health outcomes. Analyses were so complex, and findings were so specific, that this groundbreaking literature has yet to cohere into a body of knowledge with clear implications for health policy or professional practice. At the conceptual level, it remains unclear whether IHT is best appreciated for its metaphorical or literal functions. Nevertheless, the enthusiasm surrounding IHT as an explanation for contemporary Indigenous health problems renders it imperative to refine the construct to enable more valid research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
从 20 世纪 90 年代中期开始,历史创伤的概念被引入临床和健康科学文献中,以情境化、描述和解释原住民人群中心理困扰和健康差距不成比例的高发生率。作为种族创伤的概念先驱,原住民历史创伤(IHT)的特点是强调代际传递的祖先逆境,这会损害后代的福祉。在这项对 IHT 健康影响的系统评价中,确定了 32 篇实证文章,这些文章从统计学上分析了美国和加拿大原住民样本中 IHT 测量值与健康结果之间的关系。这些文章根据其操作 IHT 的具体方法进行了分类,其中 19 篇文章被归类为历史损失研究,11 篇文章被归类为寄宿学校祖先研究,3 篇文章被归类为“其他”研究。这三类文章的受访者各不相同,设计也不同,统计技术也不同,健康结果也不同。大多数报告称,IHT 指标越高,与不良健康结果之间的关联越显著。分析非常复杂,结果非常具体,因此,这一开创性的文献尚未形成具有明确健康政策或专业实践意义的知识体系。在概念层面上,IHT 是最好从隐喻还是字面意义上理解仍然不清楚。尽管如此,IHT 作为当代原住民健康问题解释的热情使得对其进行细化以进行更有效的研究变得至关重要。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。