Department of Dermatology, Pontchaillou Hospital, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
University of Rennes, CNRS, IGDR, UMR 6290, Rennes, France.
Oncologist. 2019 May;24(5):657-663. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0271. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
BRAF and MEK inhibitors are approved for BRAF V600-mutated advanced melanoma, with response rates of up to 70%. Responses to targeted therapies have also been observed for diverse non-V600 BRAF alterations. Thus, sensitive, accurate, and broad detection of BRAF alterations is critical to match patients with available targeted therapies.
Pathology reports were reviewed for 385 consecutive melanoma cases with BRAF mutations or rearrangements identified using a hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay during the course of clinical care.
Records of prior BRAF molecular testing were available for 79 (21%) cases. Of cases with BRAF V600 mutations, 11/57 (19%) with available data were negative by prior BRAF testing. Prior negative BRAF results were also identified in 16/20 (80%) cases with non-V600 mutations, 2 of which harbored multiple BRAF alterations, and in 2/2 (100%) cases with activating BRAF fusions. Clinical outcomes for a subset of patients are presented.
CGP identifies diverse activating BRAF alterations in a significant fraction of cases with prior negative testing. Given the proven clinical benefit of BRAF/MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutated melanoma, CGP should be considered for patients with metastatic melanoma, particularly if other testing is negative.
Published guidelines for melanoma treatment recommend BRAF mutational analysis, but little guidance is provided as to selection criteria for testing methodologies, or as to clinical implications for non-V600 alterations. This study found that hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing can detect BRAF alterations in samples from a significant fraction of patients with advanced melanoma with prior negative BRAF results. This study highlights the need for oncologists and pathologists to be critically aware of coverage and sensitivity limitations of various assays, particularly regarding non-V600E alterations, of which many are potentially targetable.
BRAF 和 MEK 抑制剂已被批准用于治疗 BRAF V600 突变的晚期黑色素瘤,其反应率高达 70%。针对不同的非 V600 BRAF 改变也观察到了靶向治疗的反应。因此,对 BRAF 改变进行敏感、准确和广泛的检测对于将患者与可用的靶向治疗相匹配至关重要。
在临床护理过程中,使用基于杂交捕获的下一代测序综合基因组分析(CGP)检测方法,对 385 例连续的黑色素瘤病例的 BRAF 突变或重排进行了回顾性分析。
有 79 例(21%)病例有 BRAF 分子检测的既往记录。在有可用数据的 BRAF V600 突变病例中,11/57(19%)例既往 BRAF 检测为阴性。在 16/20(80%)例非 V600 突变病例中也发现了既往阴性 BRAF 结果,其中 2 例存在多种 BRAF 改变,在 2/2(100%)例激活 BRAF 融合病例中也发现了既往阴性 BRAF 结果。呈现了一部分患者的临床结果。
CGP 在先前阴性检测的病例中发现了大量不同的激活 BRAF 改变。鉴于 BRAF/MEK 抑制剂在 BRAF 突变黑色素瘤中的临床获益已得到证实,对于转移性黑色素瘤患者,特别是如果其他检测为阴性,应考虑使用 CGP。
黑色素瘤治疗的发表指南建议进行 BRAF 突变分析,但对于检测方法的选择标准,或对于非 V600 改变的临床意义,几乎没有提供指导。本研究发现,基于杂交捕获的下一代测序可以在先前 BRAF 结果为阴性的晚期黑色素瘤患者的大量样本中检测到 BRAF 改变。本研究强调了肿瘤学家和病理学家需要对各种检测方法的覆盖范围和敏感性限制有批判性的认识,特别是对于非 V600E 改变,其中许多改变可能是可靶向的。