School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Feb 6;18(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0932-3.
This study aimed to measure outpatients' general satisfaction with and experiences of different aspects of health care in Chinese public hospitals and to investigate to what extent general satisfaction could be explained by patients' experiences in public hospitals located at urban and rural areas.
Data on 4782 outpatients were derived from a patient survey in 9 city-level (urban) and 16 county-level (rural) public hospitals across China in 2016. According to Donabedian's model, questions on patients' experiences were categorized into six aspects under "structure" and "process", with general satisfaction representing "outcome". The Chi-square tests were used to test the differences in patients' experiences and general satisfaction between urban and rural areas. The Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to estimate effects of patients' experiences on general satisfaction.
Compared with respondents in rural areas, there were significantly higher percentages of respondents in urban areas reporting satisfaction and positive experiences in most aspects. As manifested by the path coefficients in PLS models, the positive effect of professional competence (0.197) on general satisfaction was the most significant in respondents at urban areas, followed by communication and information (0.183), and caring attitudes and emotional support (0.174). Among respondents at rural areas, the positive effect of environment facilities (0.199) was the most significant, followed by caring attitudes and emotional support (0.188), and professional competence (0.179). The PLS models explained 44.9 and 46.0% of variations in patient satisfaction at urban and rural areas, respectively.
Levels of patient satisfaction and experiences at Chinese public hospitals were higher in urban than in rural areas. Outpatients' experiences of professional competence, caring attitudes and emotional support were strongly related to their satisfaction in both settings. However, among respondents in urban areas, experiences of communication and information were more strongly related to satisfaction, whereas among respondents in rural areas, experiences of environment and facilities were more strongly related to satisfaction.
本研究旨在测量中国公立医院门诊患者对医疗服务各方面的总体满意度和体验,并探讨患者在城乡公立医院的体验在多大程度上可以解释总体满意度。
本研究数据来源于 2016 年在中国 9 家市级(城市)和 16 家县级(农村)公立医院进行的患者调查,共涉及 4782 名门诊患者。根据 Donabedian 模型,患者体验相关问题被分为“结构”和“过程”下的六个方面,总体满意度代表“结果”。采用卡方检验比较城乡地区患者体验和总体满意度的差异。采用偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLS-SEM)估计患者体验对总体满意度的影响。
与农村地区的受访者相比,城市地区的受访者在大多数方面报告满意度和积极体验的比例明显更高。在 PLS 模型中,专业能力(0.197)对城市地区受访者总体满意度的积极影响最大,其次是沟通和信息(0.183),以及关怀态度和情感支持(0.174)。在农村地区的受访者中,环境设施(0.199)的积极影响最大,其次是关怀态度和情感支持(0.188),以及专业能力(0.179)。PLS 模型分别解释了城市和农村地区患者满意度变化的 44.9%和 46.0%。
中国公立医院的患者满意度和体验水平在城市地区高于农村地区。门诊患者对专业能力、关怀态度和情感支持的体验与其在两种环境下的满意度密切相关。然而,在城市地区的受访者中,沟通和信息的体验与满意度的关系更为密切,而在农村地区的受访者中,环境和设施的体验与满意度的关系更为密切。