Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF Fresno Center for Medical Education and Research, Fresno, California, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;47(4):876-884. doi: 10.1177/0363546518825252. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
Legacy hip outcome measures may be burdensome to patients and sometimes yield floor or ceiling effects. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) allow for low-burden data capture and limited ceiling and floor effects.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the PROMIS CAT domains demonstrate correlation against commonly used legacy patient-reported outcome measures in a population of patients presenting to a tertiary care hip preservation center. The authors hypothesized the following: (1) PROMIS CAT scores based on physical function (PF), pain interference (PIF), pain behavior, and pain intensity would show strong correlation with the following legacy scores: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12), Hip Outcome Score (HOS) Sports and Activities of Daily Living subscales, and Veterans RAND-6D (VR-6D) utility measure. (2) The mental and physical health portions of the VR-6D legacy measure would show weak correlation with mental- and psychosocial-specific PROMIS elements-depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep, and ability to participate in social roles and activities. (3) All PROMIS measures would exhibit fewer floor and ceiling effects than legacy scores.
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Prospective data were collected on 125 patients in the hip preservation clinics. Enrollees completed legacy scores (visual analog scale for pain, mHHS, iHOT-12, HOS, and VR-6D) and PROMIS CAT questionnaires (PF, PIF, pain behavior, anxiety, depression, sleep, social roles and activities, pain intensity, fatigue). Spearman rank correlations were calculated, with r values of 0 to 0.3 indicating negligible correlation; 0.3 to 0.5, weak correlation; 0.5 to 0.7, moderately strong correlation; and >0.7, strong correlation. Floor and ceiling effects were evaluated.
As anticipated, the PF-CAT yielded strong correlations with the iHOT-12, mHHS, HOS-Sports, HOS-Activities of Daily Living, and VR-6D, with r values of 0.76, 0.71, 0.81, 0.87, and 0.71, respectively. The PIF-CAT was the only pain score to show moderately strong to strong correlation with all 14 patient-reported outcome measures. A strong correlation was observed between the VR-6D and the social roles and activities CAT ( r = 0.73). The depression CAT had a significant floor effect at 19%. No additional floor or ceiling effect was present for any other legacy or PROMIS measure.
The PF-CAT shows strong correlation with legacy patient-reported outcome scores among patients presenting to a tertiary care hip preservation center. The PIF-CAT also correlates strongly with legacy and PROMIS measures evaluating physical and mental well-being. PROMIS measures are less burdensome and demonstrate no floor or ceiling effects, making them a potential alternative to legacy patient-reported outcome measures for the hip.
传统的髋关节预后测量方法可能会给患者带来负担,有时会产生地板效应或天花板效应。患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)计算机自适应测试(CAT)允许低负担的数据采集和有限的天花板和地板效应。
目的/假设:本研究的目的是确定在三级保健髋关节保护中心就诊的患者群体中,PROMIS CAT 域是否与常用的传统患者报告的预后测量结果相关。作者假设如下:(1)基于身体机能(PF)、疼痛干扰(PIF)、疼痛行为和疼痛强度的 PROMIS CAT 评分将与以下传统评分具有很强的相关性:改良 Harris 髋关节评分(mHHS)、国际髋关节结果工具-12(iHOT-12)、髋关节结果评分(HOS)运动和日常生活活动子量表以及退伍军人 RAND-6D(VR-6D)效用测量。(2)VR-6D 传统测量的心理和身体健康部分将与心理和心理特定的 PROMIS 元素(抑郁、焦虑、疲劳、睡眠和参与社会角色和活动的能力)呈弱相关。(3)所有 PROMIS 测量结果的地板和天花板效应均少于传统评分。
队列研究(诊断);证据水平,3 级。
前瞻性收集髋关节保护门诊 125 例患者的数据。登记患者完成了传统评分(疼痛的视觉模拟评分、mHHS、iHOT-12、HOS 和 VR-6D)和 PROMIS CAT 问卷(PF、PIF、疼痛行为、焦虑、抑郁、睡眠、社会角色和活动、疼痛强度、疲劳)。计算 Spearman 等级相关系数,r 值为 0 至 0.3 表示可忽略不计的相关性;0.3 至 0.5,弱相关;0.5 至 0.7,中度强相关;>0.7,强相关。评估地板和天花板效应。
如预期的那样,PF-CAT 与 iHOT-12、mHHS、HOS-Sports、HOS-Activities of Daily Living 和 VR-6D 具有很强的相关性,r 值分别为 0.76、0.71、0.81、0.87 和 0.71。PIF-CAT 是唯一与所有 14 项患者报告的预后测量结果均呈中度至强相关的疼痛评分。VR-6D 与社会角色和活动 CAT 之间存在很强的相关性(r=0.73)。抑郁 CAT 在 19%时出现明显的地板效应。没有其他传统或 PROMIS 测量出现额外的地板或天花板效应。
PF-CAT 与三级保健髋关节保护中心就诊患者的传统患者报告的预后评分具有很强的相关性。PIF-CAT 也与评估身体和心理健康的传统和 PROMIS 测量结果具有很强的相关性。PROMIS 测量方法负担较轻,且不存在地板或天花板效应,因此可能成为髋关节传统患者报告的预后测量方法的替代方法。