Suppr超能文献

位点依赖性大鱼际复合肌肉动作电位:表面记录与针极记录的比较

Site-dependent thenar compound muscle action potential: Comparison between surface and needle recordings.

作者信息

Yue Sophie, Yue Qing, Hale Tyson, Knecht Aaron

机构信息

College of Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.

Department of Communication Science and Disorders, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Bloomsburg, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32(6):841-845. doi: 10.3233/BMR-181188.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within the thenar eminence, the median nerve innervates three muscles: abductor pollicis brevis (APB), flexor pollicis brevis (FPB), and opponens pollicis (OP). Of these muscles, APB was often considered as the sole contributor to the thenar compound muscle action potential (CMAP).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate subcomponents of the thenar CMAP from the median nerve innervated muscles.

METHODS

Surface and needle CMAPs were recorded in normal human subjects from three recording sites: proximal (site-I), middle (site-II), and distal (site-III) aspects of the thenar eminence when the median nerve was activated at the wrist.

RESULTS

In the site-I and -II, both the surface and needle CMAPs shared many similar characteristics although the needle CMAPs were larger (∼ 5 folds) and briefer (∼ 60%, needle/surface duration). In addition, on the surface recording, the CMAP was larger (by ∼ 1.9 mV) when recorded from the site-I comparing to that of the site-II. In the site-III, the surface recordings registered a delayed (by ∼ 3.8 ms) CMAP. The muscle fiber action potential (MFAP) study suggested a predominant FPB contribution in the site-III.

CONCLUSION

The optimal recording site for APB derived thenar CMAP is the site-I and for FPB is the site-III. The CMAPs registered by the needle recordings are more robust than the surface ones.

摘要

背景

在鱼际肌隆起处,正中神经支配三块肌肉:拇短展肌(APB)、拇短屈肌(FPB)和拇对掌肌(OP)。在这些肌肉中,APB常被认为是鱼际复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)的唯一贡献者。

目的

评估来自正中神经支配肌肉的鱼际CMAP的亚成分。

方法

在正常人体受试者中,当在腕部激活正中神经时,从鱼际肌隆起的三个记录部位:近端(部位I)、中部(部位II)和远端(部位III)记录表面和针电极CMAP。

结果

在部位I和部位II,表面和针电极CMAP具有许多相似特征,尽管针电极CMAP更大(约5倍)且更短暂(约60%,针电极/表面持续时间)。此外,在表面记录中,从部位I记录的CMAP比部位II的大(约1.9 mV)。在部位III,表面记录显示CMAP延迟(约3.8 ms)。肌纤维动作电位(MFAP)研究表明在部位III中主要是FPB的贡献。

结论

源自APB的鱼际CMAP的最佳记录部位是部位I,而源自FPB的是部位III。针电极记录的CMAP比表面记录的更可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验