Mannaerts Guido H H, Allatif Rowaa E A, Al Hashmi Fatima Y, Bhosale Arati, Hammo Ahmad N, Isied Sujoud H, Qureshi Warda A, Al Hamad Omar S, Kayyal Yasser, Al Afari Hmouda S T
Department of Surgery, Tawam Hospital/Johns Hopkins, P.O. Box 15258, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Department of Anesthesia, Tawam Hospital/Johns Hopkins, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Obes Surg. 2019 Jul;29(7):2100-2109. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03841-4.
Although enhanced recovery after bariatric surgery (ERABS) has proven to be safe and cost-effective, this concept is relatively new in the Middle East.
A retrospective analysis of consecutive registered cohorts of patients who underwent primary and purely laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) were compared before introduction of ERABS (2010-2014) and after ERABS (2015-2017) at Tawam Hospital/Johns Hopkins, the UAE.
A total of 462 eligible bariatric patients (LSG 414 and LRYGB 48) were operated on before and 1602 (LSG 1436 and LRYGB 166) after introduction of the ERABS. Significant improvements of mean patient time of the patient being within the OR for LSG (from 2:27 to 1:23 min, p = 0.000) and LRYGB (from 3:17 to 1:59 min, p = 0.000) were achieved when comparing pre-ERABS with after introduction of ERABS. Furthermore, there was a significant decrease in LOS in both LSG (from 3.2 to 1.5 days, p = 0.000) and in LRYGB (from 3.5 to 1.7 days, p = 0.000). Major (CD classification III-IV) complications decreased significantly in LSG (from 13.8 to 0.8%, p = 0.000) and were similar in LRYGB (from 4.2% to 3.0%, p = NS). The readmission rate for LSG (from 2.9 to 2.6%, p = NS) or LRYGB (from 0 to 4.8%, p = NS) and the reoperation rates after LSG (from 0.7 to 0.5%, p = NS) and LRYGB (from 0 to 2.4%, p = NS) did not differ between both groups following introduction of ERABS.
Implementation of a standardized ERABS program in the Middle East is feasible and safe and leads to reduced LOS and OR times.
尽管减重手术后的加速康复(ERABS)已被证明是安全且具有成本效益的,但这一概念在中东地区相对较新。
对在阿联酋塔瓦姆医院/约翰霍普金斯医院于ERABS引入前(2010 - 2014年)和引入后(2015 - 2017年)接受初次和单纯腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)或腹腔镜Roux - Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)的连续登记队列患者进行回顾性分析并比较。
在引入ERABS之前,共有462例符合条件的减重患者(LSG 414例,LRYGB 48例)接受手术,引入后有1602例(LSG 1436例,LRYGB 166例)。将ERABS引入前与引入后进行比较时,LSG患者在手术室的平均时间有显著改善(从2:27降至1:23分钟,p = 0.00),LRYGB患者也是如此(从3:17降至1:59分钟,p = 0.00)。此外,LSG(从3.2天降至1.5天,p = 0.00)和LRYGB(从3.5天降至1.7天,p = 0.00)的住院时间均显著缩短。LSG的主要(CD分类III - IV级)并发症显著减少(从13.8%降至0.8%,p = 0.00),LRYGB的主要并发症情况相似(从4.2%降至3.0%,p = 无统计学意义)。引入ERABS后,LSG(从2.9%降至2.6%,p = 无统计学意义)或LRYGB(从0降至4.8%,p = 无统计学意义)的再入院率以及LSG(从0.7%降至0.5%,p = 无统计学意义)和LRYGB(从0降至2.4%,p = 无统计学意义)的再次手术率在两组之间没有差异。
在中东地区实施标准化的ERABS方案是可行且安全的,并可缩短住院时间和手术时间。