Rep Prog Phys. 2019 Jun;82(6):064602. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/ab1628. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
The minimal structural unit of a solid tumor is a single cell or a cellular compartment such as the nucleus. A closer look inside the cells reveals that there are functional compartments or even structural domains determining the overall properties of a cell such as the mechanical phenotype. The mechanical interaction of these living cells leads to the complex organization such as compartments, tissues and organs of organisms including mammals. In contrast to passive non-living materials, living cells actively respond to the mechanical perturbations occurring in their microenvironment during diseases such as fibrosis and cancer. The transformation of single cancer cells in highly aggressive and hence malignant cancer cells during malignant cancer progression encompasses the basement membrane crossing, the invasion of connective tissue, the stroma microenvironments and transbarrier migration, which all require the immediate interaction of the aggressive and invasive cancer cells with the surrounding extracellular matrix environment including normal embedded neighboring cells. All these steps of the metastatic pathway seem to involve mechanical interactions between cancer cells and their microenvironment. The pathology of cancer due to a broad heterogeneity of cancer types is still not fully understood. Hence it is necessary to reveal the signaling pathways such as mechanotransduction pathways that seem to be commonly involved in the development and establishment of the metastatic and mechanical phenotype in several carcinoma cells. We still do not know whether there exist distinct metastatic genes regulating the progression of tumors. These metastatic genes may then be activated either during the progression of cancer by themselves on their migration path or in earlier stages of oncogenesis through activated oncogenes or inactivated tumor suppressor genes, both of which promote the metastatic phenotype. In more detail, the adhesion of cancer cells to their surrounding stroma induces the generation of intracellular contraction forces that deform their microenvironments by alignment of fibers. The amplitude of these forces can adapt to the mechanical properties of the microenvironment. Moreover, the adhesion strength of cancer cells seems to determine whether a cancer cell is able to migrate through connective tissue or across barriers such as the basement membrane or endothelial cell linings of blood or lymph vessels in order to metastasize. In turn, exposure of adherent cancer cells to physical forces, such as shear flow in vessels or compression forces around tumors, reinforces cell adhesion, regulates cell contractility and restructures the ordering of the local stroma matrix that leads subsequently to secretion of crosslinking proteins or matrix degrading enzymes. Hence invasive cancer cells alter the mechanical properties of their microenvironment. From a mechanobiological point-of-view, the recognized physical signals are transduced into biochemical signaling events that guide cellular responses such as cancer progression after the malignant transition of cancer cells from an epithelial and non-motile phenotype to a mesenchymal and motile (invasive) phenotype providing cellular motility. This transition can also be described as the physical attempt to relate this cancer cell transitional behavior to a T1 phase transition such as the jamming to unjamming transition. During the invasion of cancer cells, cell adaptation occurs to mechanical alterations of the local stroma, such as enhanced stroma upon fibrosis, and therefore we need to uncover underlying mechano-coupling and mechano-regulating functional processes that reinforce the invasion of cancer cells. Moreover, these mechanisms may also be responsible for the awakening of dormant residual cancer cells within the microenvironment. Physicists were initially tempted to consider the steps of the cancer metastasis cascade as single events caused by a single mechanical alteration of the overall properties of the cancer cell. However, this general and simple view has been challenged by the finding that several mechanical properties of cancer cells and their microenvironment influence each other and continuously contribute to tumor growth and cancer progression. In addition, basement membrane crossing, cell invasion and transbarrier migration during cancer progression is explained in physical terms by applying physical principles on living cells regardless of their complexity and individual differences of cancer types. As a novel approach, the impact of the individual microenvironment surrounding cancer cells is also included. Moreover, new theories and models are still needed to understand why certain cancers are malignant and aggressive, while others stay still benign. However, due to the broad variety of cancer types, there may be various pathways solely suitable for specific cancer types and distinct steps in the process of cancer progression. In this review, physical concepts and hypotheses of cancer initiation and progression including cancer cell basement membrane crossing, invasion and transbarrier migration are presented and discussed from a biophysical point-of-view. In addition, the crosstalk between cancer cells and a chronically altered microenvironment, such as fibrosis, is discussed including the basic physical concepts of fibrosis and the cellular responses to mechanical stress caused by the mechanically altered microenvironment. Here, is highlighted how biophysical approaches, both experimentally and theoretically, have an impact on classical hallmarks of cancer and fibrosis and how they contribute to the understanding of the regulation of cancer and its progression by sensing and responding to the physical environmental properties through mechanotransduction processes. Finally, this review discusses various physical models of cell migration such as blebbing, nuclear piston, protrusive force and unjamming transition migration modes and how they contribute to cancer progression. Moreover, these cellular migration modes are influenced by microenvironmental perturbances such as fibrosis that can induce mechanical alterations in cancer cells, which in turn may impact the environment. Hence, the classical hallmarks of cancer need to be refined by including biomechanical properties of cells, cell clusters and tissues and their microenvironment to understand mechano-regulatory processes within cancer cells and the entire organism.
实体瘤的最小结构单元是单个细胞或细胞区室,如细胞核。在细胞内部观察,会发现存在功能性区室,甚至结构域,决定着细胞的整体特性,如力学表型。这些活细胞的力学相互作用导致了组织和器官等生物机体的复杂组织,如器官。与被动的非生命材料不同,在疾病(如纤维化和癌症)过程中,活细胞会积极响应其微环境中的力学扰动。在恶性癌症进展过程中,单个癌细胞向高度侵袭性和恶性的癌细胞的转化,包括基底膜穿透、结缔组织浸润、基质微环境和跨屏障迁移,这些都需要侵袭性和转移性癌细胞与包括正常嵌入的邻近细胞在内的周围细胞外基质环境的即时相互作用。癌细胞及其微环境之间的力学相互作用似乎涉及到转移途径的所有步骤。由于癌症类型广泛存在异质性,癌症的病理学仍然没有得到充分的理解。因此,有必要揭示机械转导途径等信号通路,这些信号通路似乎在几种癌细胞的转移和力学表型的发展和建立中普遍涉及。我们仍然不知道是否存在调节肿瘤进展的特定转移性基因。这些转移性基因可能在癌症进展过程中自行激活,或者在致癌作用的早期阶段通过激活的癌基因或失活的肿瘤抑制基因激活,从而促进转移性表型。更详细地说,癌细胞与周围基质的黏附诱导细胞内收缩力的产生,通过纤维的排列使微环境变形。这些力的幅度可以适应微环境的力学特性。此外,癌细胞的黏附强度似乎决定了癌细胞是否能够穿过结缔组织,或者穿过基底膜或血管或淋巴管内皮细胞的屏障进行转移。反过来,黏附的癌细胞暴露于物理力(如血管中的切变流或肿瘤周围的压缩力)会增强细胞黏附,调节细胞收缩性,并重构局部基质基质的排列,随后导致交联蛋白或基质降解酶的分泌。因此,侵袭性癌细胞会改变其微环境的力学特性。从生物力学的角度来看,公认的物理信号被转导成生化信号事件,这些信号事件指导细胞反应,如恶性癌细胞从上皮和非运动表型向间质和运动(侵袭)表型的恶性转化后的癌症进展,为细胞运动提供动力。这种转变也可以被描述为物理上试图将这种癌细胞过渡行为与 T1 相变联系起来,例如从堵塞到解堵塞的转变。在癌细胞侵袭过程中,细胞会适应局部基质的力学变化,例如纤维化时基质增强,因此我们需要揭示潜在的机械耦联和机械调节功能过程,以增强癌细胞的侵袭。此外,这些机制也可能负责唤醒微环境中休眠的残留癌细胞。物理学家最初倾向于认为癌症转移级联的步骤是由癌细胞整体性质的单一力学改变引起的单个事件。然而,这种一般而简单的观点受到了挑战,因为发现癌细胞及其微环境的几个力学特性相互影响,并持续促进肿瘤生长和癌症进展。此外,在癌症进展过程中,基底膜穿透、细胞侵袭和跨屏障迁移是通过将物理原理应用于活细胞来解释的,而不管其复杂性和癌症类型的个体差异如何。作为一种新方法,还包括周围癌症细胞的个体微环境的影响。此外,还需要新的理论和模型来理解为什么某些癌症是恶性和侵袭性的,而其他癌症仍然是良性的。然而,由于癌症类型的广泛多样性,可能存在仅适用于特定癌症类型的各种途径,以及癌症进展过程中的不同步骤。在这篇综述中,从生物物理的角度提出和讨论了癌症起始和进展的物理概念和假设,包括癌细胞基底膜穿透、侵袭和跨屏障迁移。此外,还讨论了癌症细胞与慢性改变的微环境(如纤维化)之间的串扰,包括纤维化的基本物理概念和细胞对由机械改变的微环境引起的机械应激的反应。这里强调了生物物理方法,无论是实验的还是理论的,如何对癌症和纤维化的经典特征产生影响,以及它们如何通过机械转导过程来感知和响应物理环境特性,从而有助于理解癌症的调控及其进展。最后,本文讨论了各种细胞迁移模式,如起泡、核活塞、突出力和非堵塞迁移模式,以及它们如何促进癌症进展。此外,这些细胞迁移模式受到纤维化等微环境扰动的影响,纤维化会导致癌细胞的力学改变,进而可能影响环境。因此,需要将细胞、细胞簇和组织及其微环境的生物力学特性纳入癌症的经典特征中,以理解癌细胞内和整个生物体中的机械调节过程。