Montero-Marin Jesus, Perez-Yus Maria C, Cebolla Ausias, Soler Joaquim, Demarzo Marcelo, Garcia-Campayo Javier
Primary Care Prevention and Health Promotion Research Network (RedIAPP), Zaragoza, Spain.
Department of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 27;10:630. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00630. eCollection 2019.
There has been increased interest in the relationships between religiosity, meditation practice and well-being, but there is lack of understanding as to how specific religious components and distinct meditation practices could influence different positive and negative psychological adjustment outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the explanatory power of religious beliefs and the practice of prayer, focused attention (FA), open monitoring (OM), and compassion meditation (CM) on psychological adjustment, taking into consideration a number of practice-related variables such as session length, frequency of practice and lifetime practice. Psychological adjustment was assessed by means of happiness, positive affect, depression, negative affect, and emotional overproduction. A cross-sectional design was used, with a final sample comprising 210 Spanish participants who completed an online assessment protocol. Hierarchical regressions were performed, including age, sex and psychotropic medication use in the first step as possible confounders, with the addition of religious beliefs and the practice of prayer, FA, OM, and CM in the second step. FA session length was related to all psychological adjustment outcomes: happiness (Δ = 0.09, = 0.002; β = 0.25, = 0.001), positive affect (Δ = 0.09, = 0.002; β = 0.18, = 0.014), depression (ΔR = 0.07, = 0.004; β = -0.27, < 0.001), negative affect (Δ = 0.08, = 0.007; β = -0.27, < 0.001) and emotional overproduction (Δ = 0.07, = 0.013; β = -0.23, = 0.001). CM session length was related to positive affect (β = 0.18, = 0.011). CM practice frequency was associated with happiness (Δ = 0.06, = 0.038; β = 0.16, = 0.041). Lifetime practice of FA was related to happiness (Δ = 0.08, = 0.007; β = 0.21, = 0.030) and OM to emotional overproduction (Δ = 0.08, = 0.037; β = -0.19, = 0.047). Religious beliefs and prayer seemed to be less relevant than meditation practices such as FA, OM, and CM in explaining psychological adjustment. The distinct meditation practices might be differentially related to distinct psychological adjustment outcomes through different practice-related variables. However, research into other forms of institutional religiosity integrating social aspects of religion is required.
宗教虔诚、冥想练习与幸福感之间的关系越来越受到关注,但对于特定宗教成分和不同冥想练习如何影响不同的积极和消极心理调适结果,人们还缺乏了解。本研究的目的是评估宗教信仰以及祈祷、专注注意力(FA)、开放监测(OM)和慈悲冥想(CM)练习对心理调适的解释力,同时考虑一些与练习相关的变量,如练习时长、练习频率和终生练习情况。通过幸福感、积极情绪、抑郁、消极情绪和情绪过度产生来评估心理调适。采用横断面设计,最终样本包括210名完成在线评估方案的西班牙参与者。进行了分层回归分析,第一步纳入年龄、性别和使用精神药物作为可能的混杂因素,第二步加入宗教信仰以及祈祷、FA、OM和CM练习。FA练习时长与所有心理调适结果相关:幸福感(ΔR² = 0.(此处原文可能有误,推测为0.09),p = 0.002;β = 0.25,p = 0.001)、积极情绪(ΔR² = 0.09,p = 0.002;β = 0.18,p = 0.014)、抑郁(ΔR² = 0.07,p = 0.004;β = -0.27,p < 0.001)、消极情绪(ΔR² = 0.08,p = 0.007;β = -0.27,p < 0.001)和情绪过度产生(ΔR² = 0.07,p = 0.013;β = -0.23,p = 0.001)。CM练习时长与积极情绪相关(β = 0.18,p = 0.011)。CM练习频率与幸福感相关(ΔR² = 0.06,p = 0.038;β = 0.16,p = 0.041)。FA的终生练习与幸福感相关(ΔR² = 0.08,p = 0.007;β = 0.21,p = 0.030),OM与情绪过度产生相关(ΔR² = 0.08,p = 0.037;β = -0.19,p = 0.047)。在解释心理调适时,宗教信仰和祈祷似乎不如FA、OM和CM等冥想练习重要。不同的冥想练习可能通过不同的与练习相关变量与不同的心理调适结果存在差异关联。然而,还需要对整合宗教社会层面的其他形式的制度性宗教进行研究。