Leukemia Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Department of Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jul 15;25(14):4264-4270. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0361. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
Clinical trials of venetoclax reported negligible rates of clinical tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) when using an extended dose escalation schedule. We aimed to understand TLS prophylaxis, rates of select adverse events (AE), and impact of dosing modifications in routine clinical practice.
This retrospective cohort study included 297 CLL venetoclax-treated patients outside of clinical trials in academic and community centers. Demographics, baseline disease characteristics, venetoclax dosing, TLS risk and prophylaxis, and AEs were collected.
The group was 69% male, 96% had relapsed/refractory CLL, 45% had deletion chromosome 17p, 84% had unmutated , 80% received venetoclax monotherapy, and median age was 67. TLS risk was categorized as low (40%), intermediate (32%), or high (28%), and 62% had imaging prior to venetoclax initiation. Clinical TLS occurred in 2.7% of patients and laboratory TLS occurred in 5.7%. Pre-venetoclax TLS risk group and creatinine clearance independently predict TLS development in multivariable analysis. Grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (39.6%), thrombocytopenia (29.2%), infection (25%), neutropenic fever (7.9%), and diarrhea (6.9%). Twenty-two patients (7.4%) discontinued venetoclax due to an AE. Progression-free survival was similar regardless of number of dose interruptions, length of dose interruption, and stable venetoclax dose.
These data provide insights into current use of venetoclax in clinical practice, including TLS rates observed in clinical practice. We identified opportunities for improved adherence to TLS risk stratification and prophylaxis, which may improve safety.
临床试验报告称,在使用扩展剂量递增方案治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)患者时,维奈托克的临床肿瘤溶解综合征(TLS)发生率可忽略不计。我们旨在了解 TLS 预防、选择不良事件(AE)的发生率以及常规临床实践中剂量调整的影响。
本回顾性队列研究纳入了在学术和社区中心进行的临床试验之外接受维奈托克治疗的 297 例 CLL 患者。收集了人口统计学、基线疾病特征、维奈托克剂量、TLS 风险和预防以及 AE 等数据。
该组患者中 69%为男性,96%患有复发/难治性 CLL,45%存在 17p 缺失染色体,84%存在未突变,80%接受维奈托克单药治疗,中位年龄为 67 岁。TLS 风险分为低危(40%)、中危(32%)和高危(28%),62%的患者在开始维奈托克治疗前进行了影像学检查。临床 TLS 发生率为 2.7%,实验室 TLS 发生率为 5.7%。多变量分析显示,维奈托克治疗前的 TLS 风险组和肌酐清除率可独立预测 TLS 的发生。3/4 级 AE 包括中性粒细胞减少症(39.6%)、血小板减少症(29.2%)、感染(25%)、中性粒细胞减少性发热(7.9%)和腹泻(6.9%)。22 例(7.4%)患者因 AE 停用维奈托克。无论剂量中断次数、剂量中断时间长短和维奈托克稳定剂量如何,无进展生存期均相似。
这些数据提供了有关维奈托克在临床实践中的当前使用情况的见解,包括在临床实践中观察到的 TLS 发生率。我们确定了改善 TLS 风险分层和预防措施依从性的机会,这可能会提高安全性。