Universidad Francisco Marroquin, Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 May 1;101(9):e35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00650.
Shared decision-making (SDM) is widely accepted as an essential feature of patient-centered care. However, to our knowledge, there has been no empirical research on the factors that influence orthopaedic surgeons' use of SDM in Guatemala.
Questions about physician attributes and SDM were included in a 2016 electronic survey distributed to the 221 members of the Asociación Guatemalteca de Ortopedia y Traumatología (AGOT).
A total of 114 (52%) of the AGOT-registered orthopaedic surgery residents and orthopaedic surgeons who were sent surveys returned them, and 79 of these surveys contained complete responses to study variables of interest. Of the 79 participants with complete responses, 73% reported that they discussed treatment options most of the time or always with their patients and 81% reported that they explained the reasons for treatment choices. Compared with residents, surgeons who had completed their residency in orthopaedic surgery or had subspecialty training had greater odds (odds ratio [OR] = 9.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35, 68.53; p < 0.05) of explaining the reasons for their decisions rather than using other strategies when patients expressed different preferences. Residents and surgeons who discussed treatment choices with their patients were more likely to allow their patients to participate in treatment decisions than those who did not (OR = 2.88; 95% CI = 1.90, 4.36; p < 0.001).
While findings from this exploratory study are limited by its small sample size and its narrow focus on physicians rather than on both patients and physicians, they nonetheless establish a roadmap for future study, particularly with respect to challenges in Guatemala to meaningful SDM that arise from context-specific cultural norms and practices.
SDM as a tool of practice remains underutilized by orthopaedic surgeons in clinical practice in Guatemala. This study may encourage more discussions regarding SDM in orthopaedic surgery elsewhere in Central America and prompt discussion in the region on the value of and need for postgraduate training in this area.
共享决策(SDM)被广泛认为是患者为中心护理的一个重要特征。然而,据我们所知,在危地马拉,还没有关于影响骨科医生使用 SDM 的因素的实证研究。
在 2016 年向危地马拉骨科与创伤协会(AGOT)的 221 名成员分发的电子调查中,包含了关于医生特征和 SDM 的问题。
共向发送调查的 221 名 AGOT 注册骨科住院医师和骨科医生中的 114 名(52%)返回了调查,其中 79 份调查包含了对研究变量的完整回复。在 79 名有完整回复的参与者中,73%的人报告说他们大部分时间或总是与患者讨论治疗方案,81%的人报告说他们解释了治疗选择的原因。与住院医师相比,完成骨科住院医师培训或专科培训的外科医生更有可能(比值比[OR] = 9.62;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.35,68.53;p < 0.05)在患者表达不同偏好时,解释他们决策的原因,而不是使用其他策略。与那些不讨论治疗选择的患者相比,与患者讨论治疗选择的住院医师和外科医生更有可能让患者参与治疗决策(比值比[OR] = 2.88;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.90,4.36;p < 0.001)。
尽管这项探索性研究的结果受到样本量小以及仅关注医生而不是患者和医生的局限性的限制,但它为未来的研究奠定了基础,特别是在危地马拉,特定于情境的文化规范和实践带来了对有意义的 SDM 的挑战。
在危地马拉,SDM 作为一种实践工具在骨科医生的临床实践中仍未得到充分利用。这项研究可能会鼓励在中美洲其他地区更多地讨论骨科手术中的 SDM,并在该地区就该领域的研究生培训的价值和必要性展开讨论。