Department of Health Research & Policy and the Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Gramercy Research Group, Winston-Salem State University, Winston-Salem, NC.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019 Jun;51(6):1340-1353. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001945.
This article describes effective interventions to promote regular physical activity and reduce sedentary behavior that were identified as part of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report.
A comprehensive literature search was conducted of eligible systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and relevant governmental reports published between 2011 and 2016. For the physical activity promotion question, articles were first sorted by four social ecological levels of impact (i.e., individual, community, communication environment, and physical environment and policy levels) and then further sorted into more specific categories that emerged during the review process. For the sedentary behavior reduction question, the literature was sorted directly into emergent categories (i.e., youth, adult, and worksite interventions).
Effective physical activity promotion strategies were identified at each level of impact, including those based on behavior change theories and those occurring at different settings throughout the community. Effective interventions also included those delivered in person by trained staff or peer volunteers and through different information and communication technologies, such as by phone, Web or Internet, and computer-tailored print. A range of built environment features were associated with more transit-based and recreational physical activity in children and adults. Effective sedentary reduction interventions were found for youth and in the workplace.
A promising number of interventions with demonstrated effectiveness were identified. Future recommendations for research include investigating the most useful methods for disseminating them to real-world settings; incorporating more diverse population subgroups, including vulnerable and underrepresented subgroups; collecting cost data to inform cost-effectiveness comparisons; and testing strategies across different levels of impact to determine which combinations achieve the greatest effects on different modes of physical activity across the week.
本文描述了促进经常进行身体活动和减少久坐行为的有效干预措施,这些干预措施是 2018 年身体活动指南咨询委员会科学报告的一部分。
对 2011 年至 2016 年间发表的合格系统评价、荟萃分析和相关政府报告进行了全面的文献搜索。对于促进身体活动的问题,首先根据四个社会生态影响层面(即个人、社区、传播环境以及物理环境和政策层面)对文章进行排序,然后根据审查过程中出现的更具体类别进行进一步分类。对于减少久坐行为的问题,文献直接按照出现的类别进行分类(即青年、成人和工作场所干预)。
在每个影响层面都确定了有效的身体活动促进策略,包括基于行为改变理论的策略和在社区各个层面实施的策略。有效的干预措施还包括由经过培训的工作人员或同伴志愿者进行的面对面干预,以及通过不同的信息和通信技术,如通过电话、网络或互联网以及计算机定制的印刷品进行干预。一系列建筑环境特征与儿童和成人更多的过境和娱乐性身体活动相关。针对青年和工作场所发现了有效的减少久坐行为的干预措施。
确定了许多具有显著效果的有前途的干预措施。未来的研究建议包括调查将这些干预措施传播到实际环境中最有用的方法;纳入更多不同的人群亚组,包括弱势群体和代表性不足的亚组;收集成本数据以告知成本效益比较;并在不同的影响层面上测试策略,以确定哪些组合对不同模式的身体活动在一周内产生最大效果。