Johns Hopkins University, USA.
The University of Arizona, USA.
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Aug;28(6):636-651. doi: 10.1177/0963662519840222. Epub 2019 May 19.
We report the results of a large-scale study of the state of science content knowledge of volunteers in Galaxy Zoo ( www.galaxyzoo.org ), an online citizen science project in which public volunteers classify galaxies in an effort to benefit cutting-edge astronomy research. We were interested in whether participating in Galaxy Zoo leads to any increase in participants' astrophysical content knowledge. To assess volunteer content knowledge, we examined the responses of 1476 Galaxy Zoo volunteers to 32 conceptually challenging multiple-choice questions. We looked for any relationships between participants' assessment scores and the number of galaxies classified upon answering the first assessment question, the number of galaxies classified between their first response and their final response to the assessment, and the length of time since they first created their Galaxy Zoo account. All relationships were of small effect size. These results suggest that participation in the project's central galaxy classification task, in and of itself, is not associated with increased astrophysical content knowledge. We strongly recommend that future studies of online citizen science environments examine how volunteers take advantage of opportunities to develop their knowledge and skills outside of the self-contained central task, especially in the context of opportunities for interactions with other volunteers.
我们报告了一项大规模研究的结果,该研究对象是 Galaxy Zoo(www.galaxyzoo.org)志愿者的科学内容知识状态,这是一个在线公民科学项目,公众志愿者在其中对星系进行分类,以促进前沿天文学研究。我们感兴趣的是,参与 Galaxy Zoo 是否会导致参与者的天体物理内容知识有所增加。为了评估志愿者的内容知识,我们考察了 1476 名 Galaxy Zoo 志愿者对 32 个概念性具有挑战性的多项选择题的回答。我们寻找了参与者的评估分数与他们回答第一个评估问题时所分类的星系数量、他们第一次对评估做出反应到最后一次反应之间所分类的星系数量以及他们首次创建 Galaxy Zoo 账户以来的时间长度之间的任何关系。所有关系的效应大小都很小。这些结果表明,参与该项目的核心星系分类任务本身,与增加天体物理内容知识并无关联。我们强烈建议未来对在线公民科学环境的研究,要研究志愿者如何利用机会在自我包容的核心任务之外发展自己的知识和技能,尤其是在与其他志愿者互动的机会方面。