Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis.
JAMA Surg. 2019 Aug 1;154(8):706-714. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1170.
Ampullary adenocarcinoma is a rare malignant neoplasm that arises within the duodenal ampullary complex. The role of adjuvant therapy (AT) in the treatment of ampullary adenocarcinoma has not been clearly defined.
To determine if long-term survival after curative-intent resection of ampullary adenocarcinoma may be improved by selection of patients for AT directed by histologic subtype.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multinational, retrospective cohort study was conducted at 12 institutions from April 1, 2000, to July 31, 2017, among 357 patients with resected, nonmetastatic ampullary adenocarcinoma receiving surgery alone or AT. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify covariates associated with overall survival. The surgery alone and AT cohorts were matched 1:1 by propensity scores based on the likelihood of receiving AT or by survival hazard from Cox modeling. Overall survival was compared with Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Adjuvant chemotherapy (fluorouracil- or gemcitabine-based) with or without radiotherapy.
Overall survival.
A total of 357 patients (156 women and 201 men; median age, 65.8 years [interquartile range, 58-74 years]) underwent curative-intent resection of ampullary adenocarcinoma. Patients with intestinal subtype had a longer median overall survival compared with those with pancreatobiliary subtype (77 vs 54 months; P = .05). Histologic subtype was not associated with AT administration (intestinal, 52.9% [101 of 191]; and pancreatobiliary, 59.5% [78 of 131]; P = .24). Patients with pancreatobiliary histologic subtype most commonly received gemcitabine-based regimens (71.0% [22 of 31]) or combinations of gemcitabine and fluorouracil (12.9% [4 of 31]), whereas treatment of those with intestinal histologic subtype was more varied (fluorouracil, 50.0% [17 of 34]; gemcitabine, 44.1% [15 of 34]; P = .01). In the propensity score-matched cohort, AT was not associated with a survival benefit for either histologic subtype (intestinal: hazard ratio, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.67-2.16; P = .53; pancreatobiliary: hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.66-2.76; P = .41).
Adjuvant therapy was more frequently used in patients with poor prognostic factors but was not associated with demonstrable improvements in survival, regardless of tumor histologic subtype. The value of a multimodality regimen remains poorly defined.
壶腹腺癌是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,起源于十二指肠壶腹复合体。辅助治疗(AT)在壶腹腺癌治疗中的作用尚未明确界定。
通过选择接受基于组织亚型的 AT 的患者,确定根治性切除壶腹腺癌后长期生存是否可以改善。
设计、地点和参与者:这项多中心、回顾性队列研究于 2000 年 4 月 1 日至 2017 年 7 月 31 日在 12 个机构进行,共有 357 例接受手术单独或 AT 治疗的非转移性壶腹腺癌患者。使用 Cox 比例风险回归来确定与总生存相关的协变量。手术组和 AT 组通过基于接受 AT 的可能性的倾向评分或基于 Cox 模型的生存风险进行 1:1 匹配。通过 Kaplan-Meier 估计比较总生存率。
氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨为基础的辅助化疗(±放疗)。
总生存率。
共 357 例(156 名女性和 201 名男性;中位年龄 65.8 岁[四分位距,58-74 岁])接受了根治性切除的壶腹腺癌。肠型患者的中位总生存期长于胰胆管型(77 个月比 54 个月;P=0.05)。组织学亚型与 AT 给药无关(肠型,52.9%[191 例中的 101 例];和胰胆管型,59.5%[131 例中的 78 例];P=0.24)。胰胆管组织学亚型的患者最常接受吉西他滨为基础的方案(71.0%[31 例中的 22 例])或吉西他滨联合氟尿嘧啶(12.9%[31 例中的 4 例]),而肠型的治疗更为多样(氟尿嘧啶,50.0%[34 例中的 17 例];吉西他滨,44.1%[34 例中的 15 例];P=0.01)。在倾向评分匹配队列中,无论组织学亚型如何,AT 均未显示出生存获益(肠型:风险比,1.21;95%CI,0.67-2.16;P=0.53;胰胆管型:风险比,1.35;95%CI,0.66-2.76;P=0.41)。
辅助治疗更多地用于预后不良的患者,但与生存的可测量改善无关,无论肿瘤组织学亚型如何。多模式治疗方案的价值仍不明确。