a Social Marketing @ Griffith, Griffith Business School, Griffith University , Queensland , Australia.
Health Psychol Rev. 2019 Sep;13(3):295-317. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1625280. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
This review assesses the extent of reported theory use in electronic health weight management interventions targeting young adults aged 18-35 years. Twenty-four eligible studies were identified. Two independent reviewers extracted data and coded for theory use using the Theory Coding Scheme. Overall, the mean total use of theory score was 6/23 (SD = 5; Min. = 0, Max. = 17); 17 studies were classified as having weak application of theory, five as moderate, and two as strong. The majority (N = 18) of studies mentioned theory, however, most (N = 14) did not report how intervention techniques related to theoretical base. No study used theory to select intervention recipients and only four used theory to tailor intervention techniques to recipients. Limited studies reported theory testing (N = 6) and no study used intervention results to build and/or refine theory. Results indicate that weight-related outcomes may be enhanced when at least one or more theoretical constructs are explicitly linked to an intervention technique and when theoretical constructs are included in evaluations. Increases in theory application and reporting are needed to assist the scientific research community in systematically identifying which theories work, for whom, how, why, and when; thereby delivering an advanced understanding of how best to apply theory to enhance intervention outcomes.
本综述评估了针对 18-35 岁年轻成年人的电子健康体重管理干预措施中报告的理论使用程度。确定了 24 项符合条件的研究。两位独立审查员使用理论编码方案提取数据并对理论使用进行编码。总体而言,理论总使用得分的平均值为 6/23(SD=5;最小值=0,最大值=17);17 项研究被归类为理论应用薄弱,5 项为中等,2 项为强。大多数(N=18)研究提到了理论,但大多数(N=14)没有报告干预技术与理论基础的关系。没有研究使用理论来选择干预对象,只有 4 项研究使用理论根据对象来调整干预技术。有限的研究报告了理论测试(N=6),没有研究使用干预结果来构建和/或完善理论。结果表明,当至少一个或多个理论结构明确与干预技术相关联,并且理论结构包含在评估中时,与体重相关的结果可能会得到改善。需要增加理论应用和报告,以帮助科学界系统地确定哪些理论有效、针对谁、如何、为什么和何时有效;从而更深入地了解如何最好地应用理论来增强干预效果。